TY - JOUR
T1 - In-Hospital Risk Factors for Reintervention and Amputation in Brachial Arterial Trauma
AU - The AAST PROOVIT Study Group
AU - Robbins, Justin M.
AU - Crayton, Corinna
AU - Koloditch, Isaac
AU - Walk, Casey
AU - Gramajo, Limayre
AU - Shugar, Samantha
AU - Ekeh, Peter
AU - DuBose, Joseph
AU - Wong, Yee
AU - Layba, Cathline
AU - Lenart, Emily
AU - Fischer, Peter E.
AU - Barbee, Kimberly
AU - Morrison, Jonny
AU - Feliciano, David
AU - Scalea, Thomas M.
AU - Skarupa, David
AU - Mull, Jennifer A.
AU - Zuniga, Yohan Diaz
AU - Podbielski, Jeanette M.
AU - Jost, Garrett
AU - Catalano, Richard D.
AU - Penaloza, Liz
AU - Abou-Zamzam, Ahmed M.
AU - Luo-Owen, Xian
AU - Kim, Jennie
AU - Inaba, Kenji
AU - Poulin, Nathaniel
AU - Myers, John
AU - Johnson, Michael
AU - Rocchi, Kristin
AU - Gilani, Ramyar
AU - Smith, Tikesha
AU - Knight, Reginva
AU - Hammer, Peter
AU - Trexler, Scott T.
AU - Namias, Nicholas
AU - Meizoso, Jonathan P.
AU - Asensio, Juan
AU - Galante, Joseph M.
AU - Humphries, Misty
AU - Rajani, Ravi R.
AU - Benarroch-Gampel, Jaime
AU - Ramos, Christopher
AU - Dulabon, George
AU - Karmy-Jones, Riyad
AU - Larentzakis, Andreas
AU - Velmahos, George
AU - Agarwal, Suresh
AU - Badiee, Jayraan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Introduction: Brachial artery trauma is a rare but potentially devastating injury. There is little data regarding risk factors for reintervention and amputation prevention in this population, as well as anticoagulant (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) regimens and outcomes after discharge in trauma patients with vascular injuries requiring repair. This study aims to identify in-hospital risk factors for reintervention and amputation and stratify outcomes of follow-up by discharge AC or AP regimen. Methods: The AAST Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Trial database was queried for all patients who underwent traumatic brachial arterial repair from 2013 to 2022. Patients were evaluated by need for reintervention, amputation, and outcomes at follow-up by AC or AP regimen. Results: Three hundred and eleven patients required brachial repair, 28 (9%) required reoperation, and 8 (2.6%) required amputation. High injury severity score and an increased number of packed red blood cells and platelets showed a significant increase for reoperation and amputation. Damage control and shunt use were significant for the need to reoperate. Seventy-four percent (221/298) of patients were discharged with postoperative AC or AP regimens. There was no significant difference of short-term follow-up by type of AC or AP regimen. Conclusions: Damage control and temporary shunt may lead to additional operations but not an increase in amputations. However, anticoagulation intraoperatively and postoperatively does not appear to play a significant role in reducing reintervention. It also suggests that there is no increase in short-term follow-up complications with or without AC or AP therapy.
AB - Introduction: Brachial artery trauma is a rare but potentially devastating injury. There is little data regarding risk factors for reintervention and amputation prevention in this population, as well as anticoagulant (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) regimens and outcomes after discharge in trauma patients with vascular injuries requiring repair. This study aims to identify in-hospital risk factors for reintervention and amputation and stratify outcomes of follow-up by discharge AC or AP regimen. Methods: The AAST Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Trial database was queried for all patients who underwent traumatic brachial arterial repair from 2013 to 2022. Patients were evaluated by need for reintervention, amputation, and outcomes at follow-up by AC or AP regimen. Results: Three hundred and eleven patients required brachial repair, 28 (9%) required reoperation, and 8 (2.6%) required amputation. High injury severity score and an increased number of packed red blood cells and platelets showed a significant increase for reoperation and amputation. Damage control and shunt use were significant for the need to reoperate. Seventy-four percent (221/298) of patients were discharged with postoperative AC or AP regimens. There was no significant difference of short-term follow-up by type of AC or AP regimen. Conclusions: Damage control and temporary shunt may lead to additional operations but not an increase in amputations. However, anticoagulation intraoperatively and postoperatively does not appear to play a significant role in reducing reintervention. It also suggests that there is no increase in short-term follow-up complications with or without AC or AP therapy.
KW - Amputation
KW - Brachial artery
KW - PROOVIT
KW - Reintervention
KW - Trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195065322&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.020
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 38838429
AN - SCOPUS:85195065322
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 300
SP - 318
EP - 324
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
ER -