TY - JOUR
T1 - In Silico Re-Optimization of Atezolizumab Dosing Using Population Pharmacokinetic Simulation and Exposure–Response Simulation
AU - Peer, Cody J.
AU - Schmidt, Keith T.
AU - Arisa, Oluwatobi
AU - Richardson, William J.
AU - Paydary, Koosha
AU - Goldstein, Daniel A.
AU - Gulley, James L.
AU - Figg, William D.
AU - Ratain, Mark J.
N1 - Funding Information:
D.G. has institutional research funding from Merck, BMS, and Janssen, and has received consulting fees from Vivio Health, and owns stock in Vivio Health and TailorMed. M.J.R reports personal fees from Apotex, Aptevo, Arvinas Operations, Ayala Pharma, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, bluebird bio, Credit Suisse, Eagle Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono, Emerson Lake Safety, EQRx, Genentech, Oncovalent Therapeutics, William Blair, Fresenius Kabi, Sandoz, Actavis, Aurobindo, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Mylan, Hetero Labs, Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Teva, Mereo, T3 Pharmaceuticals, Shilpa, Accord, MSN, and Natco, outside the submitted work; a pending patent application for low‐dose tocilizumab for COVID‐19; and leadership roles (director and treasurer) in the Optimal Cancer Care Alliance. This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (grant ZIC SC 006537) and from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (grant T32 GM007019).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Atezolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), was initially approved in 2016, around the same time that the sponsor published the minimum serum concentration to maintain the saturation of receptor occupancy (6 μg/mL). The initially approved dose regimen of 1200 mg every 3 weeks (q3w) was subsequently modified to 840 mg q2w or 1680 mg q4w through pharmacokinetic simulations. Yet, each standard regimen yields steady-state trough concentrations (CMIN,SS) far exceeding (≈ 40-fold) the stated target concentration. Additionally, the steady-state area under the plasma drug concentration–time curve (AUCSS) at 1200 mg q3w was significantly (P =.027) correlated with the probability of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and, coupled with excess exposure, this provides incentive to explore alternative dose regimens to lower the exposure burden while maintaining an effective CMIN,SS. In this study, we first identified 840 mg q6w as an extended-interval regimen that could robustly maintain a serum concentration of 6 μg/mL (≥99% of virtual patients simulated, n = 1000), then applied this regimen to an approach that administers 2 “loading doses” of standard-interval regimens for a future clinical trial aiming to personalize dose regimens. Each standard dose was simulated for 2 loading doses, then 840 mg q6w thereafter; all yielded cycle-7 CMIN,SS values of >6 μg/mL in >99% of virtual patients. Further, the AUCSS from 840 mg q6w resulted in a flattening (P =.63) of the exposure–response relationship with adverse events of special interest (AESIs). We next aim to verify this in a clinical trial seeking to validate extended-interval dosing in a personalized approach using therapeutic drug monitoring.
AB - Atezolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), was initially approved in 2016, around the same time that the sponsor published the minimum serum concentration to maintain the saturation of receptor occupancy (6 μg/mL). The initially approved dose regimen of 1200 mg every 3 weeks (q3w) was subsequently modified to 840 mg q2w or 1680 mg q4w through pharmacokinetic simulations. Yet, each standard regimen yields steady-state trough concentrations (CMIN,SS) far exceeding (≈ 40-fold) the stated target concentration. Additionally, the steady-state area under the plasma drug concentration–time curve (AUCSS) at 1200 mg q3w was significantly (P =.027) correlated with the probability of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and, coupled with excess exposure, this provides incentive to explore alternative dose regimens to lower the exposure burden while maintaining an effective CMIN,SS. In this study, we first identified 840 mg q6w as an extended-interval regimen that could robustly maintain a serum concentration of 6 μg/mL (≥99% of virtual patients simulated, n = 1000), then applied this regimen to an approach that administers 2 “loading doses” of standard-interval regimens for a future clinical trial aiming to personalize dose regimens. Each standard dose was simulated for 2 loading doses, then 840 mg q6w thereafter; all yielded cycle-7 CMIN,SS values of >6 μg/mL in >99% of virtual patients. Further, the AUCSS from 840 mg q6w resulted in a flattening (P =.63) of the exposure–response relationship with adverse events of special interest (AESIs). We next aim to verify this in a clinical trial seeking to validate extended-interval dosing in a personalized approach using therapeutic drug monitoring.
KW - clinical trials
KW - immunopharmacology
KW - modeling & simulation
KW - oncology
KW - population pharmacokinetics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147590425&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jcph.2203
DO - 10.1002/jcph.2203
M3 - Article
C2 - 36624662
AN - SCOPUS:85147590425
SN - 0091-2700
VL - 63
SP - 672
EP - 680
JO - Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
JF - Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
IS - 6
ER -