Inadequate decompressive craniectomy following a wartime traumatic brain injury-an illustrative case of why size matters

Zachary C. Janatpour, Nicholas S. Szuflita, Joseph Spinelli, Daniel J. Coughlin, Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld, Randy S. Bell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury has been called the "signature injury" of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, andthe management of severe and penetrating brain injury has evolved considerably based on the experiences of militaryneurosurgeons. Current guidelines recommend that decompressive hemicraniectomy be performed with large, frontotemporoparietal bone flaps, but practice patterns vary markedly. The following case is illustrative of potential clinicalcourses, complications, and efforts to salvage inadequately-sized decompressive craniectomies performed for combatrelated severe and penetrating brain injury. The authors follow this with a review of the current literature pertaining todecompressive craniectomy, and finally provide their recommendations for some of the technical nuances of performing decompressive hemicraniectomy after severe or penetrating brain injury.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)929-933
Number of pages5
JournalMilitary Medicine
Volume184
Issue number11-12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inadequate decompressive craniectomy following a wartime traumatic brain injury-an illustrative case of why size matters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this