International Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Harmony, Dissonance, and Silence

Marco Zuin*, Behnood Bikdeli, Jennifer Ballard-Hernandez, Stefano Barco, Elisabeth M. Battinelli, George Giannakoulas, David Jimenez, Frederikus A. Klok, Darsiya Krishnathasan, Irene M. Lang, Lisa Moores, Katelyn W. Sylvester, Jeffrey I. Weitz, Gregory Piazza

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite abundant clinical innovation and burgeoning scientific investigation, pulmonary embolism (PE) has continued to pose a diagnostic and management challenge worldwide. Aging populations, patients living with a mounting number of chronic medical conditions, particularly cancer, and increasingly prevalent health care disparities herald a growing burden of PE. In the meantime, navigating expanding strategies for immediate and long-term anticoagulation, as well as advanced therapies, including catheter-based interventions for patients with more severe PE, has become progressively daunting. Accordingly, clinicians frequently turn to evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for diagnostic and management recommendations. However, numerous international guidelines, heterogeneity in recommendations, as well as areas of uncertainty or omission may leave the readers and clinicians without a clear management pathway. In this review of international PE guidelines, we highlight key areas of consistency, difference, and lack of recommendations (silence) with an emphasis on critical clinical and research needs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1561-1577
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume84
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Oct 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • guidelines
  • management
  • prognosis
  • pulmonary embolism
  • treatment

Cite this