Is It Time to Rethink How We Train Forensic Pathologists? A Qualitative Needs Assessment from the Perspective of FP Stakeholders

Introduction Forensic pathologists (FPs) play a critical role in determining the cause and manner of death, impacting public health and the judicial system. Forensic pathologist training has been de-emphasized in medical curricula, raising concerns about inadequate preparation for FP fellows and worsening an already severe FP workforce shortage, particularly in the military. This needs assessment aimed to assess stakeholder perspectives on the current state of FP training. Materials and Methods With Walter Reed Institutional Review Board approval, semistructured interviews were used to explore perceptions of FP learners, educators, and stakeholders about the current FP training paradigm. Interviews were thematically analyzed to identify views on optimization of current training, potential restructuring of curricula, and ways to address identified gaps in FP education. Results Participants perceived FP as marginalized within medical education, citing insufficient training and inadequate resources. Many suggested curricular reforms, including more structured training, increased FP educator availability, and enhanced access to materials. Despite identified challenges, participants conveyed a need for curricular reform that acknowledged specific knowledge, skills, and ability requirements of FPs. Conclusions The de-emphasis on FP training affects public health, justice, and FP workforce, which are integral to military readiness. Curricular reform is critical to sustain forensic pathology and enhance its societal contributions.