TY - JOUR
T1 - Laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of cancer has been widely adopted in the United States
AU - Fox, Justin
AU - Gross, Cary P.
AU - Longo, Walter
AU - Reddy, Vikram
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - BACKGROUND: Fewer than 10% of patients with colon cancer in the United States are reportedly treated with a laparoscopic colectomy despite the benefits it has over the open approach. This estimate, however, may be artificially low because of inaccurate case identification. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically for the treatment of colon cancer and to identify factors associated with its use. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of the 2008 to 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. SETTINGS, PATIENTS, INTERVENTIONS: Adult patients with a diagnosis of colon cancer who underwent an elective colectomy were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The overall proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically was calculated. Multivariable regression modeling was used to identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with undergoing a laparoscopic procedure. RESULTS: During the study period, 9075 (weighted = 45,549) patients were identified with 50% treated via the laparoscopic approach. Patients were more likely to undergo a laparoscopic procedure if their median annual income was $63,000+ based on home zip code (adjusted relative risk = 1.08 (1.02-1.16)) and less likely if they were 70+ years of age (adjusted relative risk = 0.93 (0.87-1.00)), female (adjusted relative risk = 0.96 (0.92-0.99)), and had Medicaid (adjusted relative risk =0.84 (0.73-0.97)), or 3+ chronic conditions (adjusted relative risk = 0.84 (0.79-0.89)). Treatment at teaching hospitals (adjusted relative risk =1.10 (1.00-1.20)) and high-volume centers (adjusted relative risk =1.41 (1.22-1.63)) was associated with undergoing a laparoscopic colectomy, whereas treatment at rural hospitals was associated with less frequent use of laparoscopic colectomy (adjusted relative risk = 0.76 (0.64-0.90)). LIMITATIONS: This study is subject to the limitations of using administrative data. CONCLUSIONS: There has been widespread adoption of the laparoscopic approach to colon resection for cancer in the United States. Disparities in access remain, with application of this technique favoring patients with a higher socioeconomic status and those able to be treated at higher-volume, academic, and nonrural centers.
AB - BACKGROUND: Fewer than 10% of patients with colon cancer in the United States are reportedly treated with a laparoscopic colectomy despite the benefits it has over the open approach. This estimate, however, may be artificially low because of inaccurate case identification. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically for the treatment of colon cancer and to identify factors associated with its use. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of the 2008 to 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. SETTINGS, PATIENTS, INTERVENTIONS: Adult patients with a diagnosis of colon cancer who underwent an elective colectomy were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The overall proportion of colon resections performed laparoscopically was calculated. Multivariable regression modeling was used to identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with undergoing a laparoscopic procedure. RESULTS: During the study period, 9075 (weighted = 45,549) patients were identified with 50% treated via the laparoscopic approach. Patients were more likely to undergo a laparoscopic procedure if their median annual income was $63,000+ based on home zip code (adjusted relative risk = 1.08 (1.02-1.16)) and less likely if they were 70+ years of age (adjusted relative risk = 0.93 (0.87-1.00)), female (adjusted relative risk = 0.96 (0.92-0.99)), and had Medicaid (adjusted relative risk =0.84 (0.73-0.97)), or 3+ chronic conditions (adjusted relative risk = 0.84 (0.79-0.89)). Treatment at teaching hospitals (adjusted relative risk =1.10 (1.00-1.20)) and high-volume centers (adjusted relative risk =1.41 (1.22-1.63)) was associated with undergoing a laparoscopic colectomy, whereas treatment at rural hospitals was associated with less frequent use of laparoscopic colectomy (adjusted relative risk = 0.76 (0.64-0.90)). LIMITATIONS: This study is subject to the limitations of using administrative data. CONCLUSIONS: There has been widespread adoption of the laparoscopic approach to colon resection for cancer in the United States. Disparities in access remain, with application of this technique favoring patients with a higher socioeconomic status and those able to be treated at higher-volume, academic, and nonrural centers.
KW - Colectomy
KW - Colon cancer
KW - Comparative effectiveness
KW - Laparoscopy
KW - Outcomes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863564801&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318249ce5a
DO - 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318249ce5a
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22513427
AN - SCOPUS:84863564801
SN - 0012-3706
VL - 55
SP - 501
EP - 508
JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
IS - 5
ER -