TY - JOUR
T1 - Levels and variations in the quality of facility-based antenatal care in Kenya
T2 - Evidence from the 2010 service provision assessment
AU - Lee, Elizabeth
AU - Madhavan, Supriya
AU - Bauhoff, Sebastian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Quality of care is emerging as an important concern for low- and middle-income countries working to expand and improve coverage. However, there is limited systematic, large-scale empirical guidance to inform policy design. Our study operationalized indicators for six dimensions of quality of care that are captured in currently available, standardized Service Provision Assessments. We implemented these measures to assess the levels and heterogeneity of antenatal care in Kenya. Using our indicator mix, we find that performance is low overall and that there is substantial variation across provinces, management authority and facility type. Overall, facilities performed highest in the dimensions of efficiency and acceptability/patient-centeredness, and lowest on effectiveness and accessibility. Public facilities generally performed worse or similarly to private or faith-based facilities. We illustrate how these data and methods can provide readily-available, low-cost decision support for policy.
AB - Quality of care is emerging as an important concern for low- and middle-income countries working to expand and improve coverage. However, there is limited systematic, large-scale empirical guidance to inform policy design. Our study operationalized indicators for six dimensions of quality of care that are captured in currently available, standardized Service Provision Assessments. We implemented these measures to assess the levels and heterogeneity of antenatal care in Kenya. Using our indicator mix, we find that performance is low overall and that there is substantial variation across provinces, management authority and facility type. Overall, facilities performed highest in the dimensions of efficiency and acceptability/patient-centeredness, and lowest on effectiveness and accessibility. Public facilities generally performed worse or similarly to private or faith-based facilities. We illustrate how these data and methods can provide readily-available, low-cost decision support for policy.
KW - Global health
KW - health care facilities
KW - quality of care
KW - variations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977071005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/heapol/czv132
DO - 10.1093/heapol/czv132
M3 - Article
C2 - 26879091
AN - SCOPUS:84977071005
SN - 0268-1080
VL - 31
SP - 777
EP - 784
JO - Health Policy and Planning
JF - Health Policy and Planning
IS - 6
ER -