TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-Term Outcomes of Traumatic Neck Vascular Injury Repairs
T2 - A Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment Registry Analysis
AU - AAST PROOVIT Study Group
AU - Nekooei, Negar
AU - Bent, Christine
AU - Brabender, Danielle
AU - Siletz, Anaar
AU - Matsushima, Kazuhide
AU - Inaba, Kenji
AU - Dubose, Joseph
AU - Martin, Matthew J.
AU - Lenart, Emily
AU - Fischer, Peter E.
AU - Barbee, Kimberly
AU - Morrison, Jonny
AU - Feliciano, David
AU - Scalea, Thomas M.
AU - Skarupa, David
AU - Mull, Jennifer A.
AU - Zuniga, Yohan Diaz
AU - Podbielski, Jeanette M.
AU - Jost, Garrett
AU - Catalano, Richard D.
AU - Penaloza, Liz
AU - Abou-Zamzam, Ahmed M.
AU - Luo-Owen, Xian
AU - Kim, Jennie
AU - Inaba, Kenji
AU - Poulin, Nathaniel
AU - Myers, John
AU - Johnson, Michael
AU - Rocchi, Kristin
AU - Layba, Cathline
AU - Shugar, Samantha
AU - Gilani, Ramyar
AU - Smith, Tikesha
AU - Knight, Reginva
AU - Hammer, Peter
AU - Trexler, Scott T.
AU - Namias, Nicholas
AU - Meizoso, Jonathan P.
AU - Asensio, Juan
AU - Galante, Joseph M.
AU - Humphries, Misty
AU - Rajani, Ravi R.
AU - Benarroch-Gampel, Jaime
AU - Ramos, Christopher
AU - Dulabon, George
AU - Karmy-Jones, Riyad
AU - Larentzakis, Andreas
AU - Velmahos, George
AU - Agarwal, Suresh
AU - Badiee, Jayraan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2026/9
Y1 - 2026/9
N2 - Introduction: Outcomes following cervical arterial repair (CAR) in trauma have been studied, but most reports focus on inpatient complications with limited insight into postdischarge events. This study evaluates long-term outcomes using follow-up data from the Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment (PROOVIT) registry. Methods: This retrospective case-control study (2012-2023) queried PROOVIT for patients with cervical arterial trauma who underwent endovascular or open repair. The PROOVIT postdischarge module was queried for patients with available follow-up. Patients’ data and CAR-related vascular complications (VCs) were collected. VCs were assessed during hospitalization (VCIHs) and postdischarge (VCPDs), and characteristics were compared between cohorts with and without complications. VC rates were also analyzed by intervention type. Results: Among 1657 patients, 140 (9%) underwent CAR, with most sustaining penetrating trauma (67%). Interventions included endovascular repair (49%), ligation/shunt (19%), and arterial repair (32%). VCIHs occurred in 27% of patients. Of the 120 discharged patients, follow-up data were available for 40 (36%). VCPDs developed in 7% of those with prior VCIHs, compared to 27% in those without (P = 0.2). VCPD rates by intervention type were: endovascular 12.5%, ligation/shunt 33%, and arterial repair 30% (P = 0.344). Predictors of VCIHs included higher Injury Severity Score, lower Glasgow Coma Scale, and internal carotid vessel injury. Predictors of VCPDs were lack of postoperative platelet transfusion and longer length of stay in intensive care unit during the index hospitalization. Complication types included reintervention, technical failure of the repair, pseudoaneurysm, and infection. Conclusions: CAR-related VCs persist postdischarge, with many occurring in patients previously complication-free. These findings underscore the need for consistent long-term follow-up in vascular trauma care.
AB - Introduction: Outcomes following cervical arterial repair (CAR) in trauma have been studied, but most reports focus on inpatient complications with limited insight into postdischarge events. This study evaluates long-term outcomes using follow-up data from the Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment (PROOVIT) registry. Methods: This retrospective case-control study (2012-2023) queried PROOVIT for patients with cervical arterial trauma who underwent endovascular or open repair. The PROOVIT postdischarge module was queried for patients with available follow-up. Patients’ data and CAR-related vascular complications (VCs) were collected. VCs were assessed during hospitalization (VCIHs) and postdischarge (VCPDs), and characteristics were compared between cohorts with and without complications. VC rates were also analyzed by intervention type. Results: Among 1657 patients, 140 (9%) underwent CAR, with most sustaining penetrating trauma (67%). Interventions included endovascular repair (49%), ligation/shunt (19%), and arterial repair (32%). VCIHs occurred in 27% of patients. Of the 120 discharged patients, follow-up data were available for 40 (36%). VCPDs developed in 7% of those with prior VCIHs, compared to 27% in those without (P = 0.2). VCPD rates by intervention type were: endovascular 12.5%, ligation/shunt 33%, and arterial repair 30% (P = 0.344). Predictors of VCIHs included higher Injury Severity Score, lower Glasgow Coma Scale, and internal carotid vessel injury. Predictors of VCPDs were lack of postoperative platelet transfusion and longer length of stay in intensive care unit during the index hospitalization. Complication types included reintervention, technical failure of the repair, pseudoaneurysm, and infection. Conclusions: CAR-related VCs persist postdischarge, with many occurring in patients previously complication-free. These findings underscore the need for consistent long-term follow-up in vascular trauma care.
KW - Cervical arterial repair
KW - Long-term outcomes
KW - Vascular trauma
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105042761241
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2026.05.054
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2026.05.054
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105042761241
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 325
SP - 394
EP - 403
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
ER -