TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-Term Social Reintegration Outcomes for Burn Survivors With and Without Peer Support Attendance
T2 - A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Study
AU - LIBRE Advisory Board
AU - Grieve, Brian
AU - Shapiro, Gabriel D.
AU - Wibbenmeyer, Lucy
AU - Acton, Amy
AU - Lee, Austin
AU - Marino, Molly
AU - Jette, Alan
AU - Schneider, Jeffrey C.
AU - Kazis, Lewis E.
AU - Ryan, Colleen M.
AU - Badger, Karen
AU - Cancio, Leopoldo C.
AU - Carrougher, Gretchen
AU - Carson, Joshua
AU - Carter, Damien
AU - Chang, Philip H.
AU - Deeter, Lindsay
AU - Edorf, Frederick
AU - Fagin, Ali
AU - Faoro, Nicholas
AU - Faucher, Lee
AU - Fauerbach, James A.
AU - Fidler, Philip
AU - Foster, Kevin
AU - Friedstat, Jonathan
AU - Gibran, Nicole
AU - Goverman, Jeremy
AU - Harrington, David
AU - Herndon, David
AU - Hickerson, William
AU - Holavanahalli, Radha
AU - Houng, Abraham
AU - Hwang, James
AU - Jeng, James
AU - Joe, Victor
AU - Kopari, Nicole
AU - Kowalske, Karen
AU - Lee, Robin
AU - Levi, Benjamin
AU - Liu, Yuk
AU - Palmieri, Tina
AU - Pomahač, Bohdan
AU - Reilly, Debra
AU - Romanowski, Kathleen
AU - Schulz, John T.
AU - Sheridan, Robert Leo
AU - Shupp, Jeffrey W.
AU - Sinha, Indranil
AU - Travis, Taryn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - Objective: To examine differences in long-term social reintegration outcomes for burn survivors with and without peer support attendance. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Community-dwelling burn survivors. Participants: Burn survivors (N=601) aged ≥18 years with injuries to ≥5% total body surface area (TBSA) or burns to critical areas (hands, feet, face, or genitals). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation Profile was used to examine the following previously validated 6 scale scores of social participation: Family and Friends, Social Interactions, Social Activities, Work and Employment, Romantic Relationships, and Sexual Relationships. Results: Burn support group attendance was reported by 330 (55%) of 596 respondents who responded to this item. Attendees had larger burn size (43.4%±23.6% vs 36.8%±23.4% TBSA burned, P<.01) and were more likely to be >10 years from injury (50% vs 42.5%, P<.01). Survivors who attended at least 1 support group scored significantly higher on 3 of the scales: Social Interactions (P=.01), Social Activities (P=.04), and Work and Employment (P=.05). In adjusted analyses, peer support attendance was associated with increased scores on the Social Interactions scale, increasing scores by 17% of an SD (95% confidence interval, 1%–33%; P=.04). Conclusions: Burn survivors who reported peer support attendance had better social interaction scores than those who did not. This is the first reported association between peer support group attendance and improvements in community reintegration in burn survivors. This cross-sectional study prompts further exploration into the potential benefits of peer support groups on burn recovery with future intervention studies.
AB - Objective: To examine differences in long-term social reintegration outcomes for burn survivors with and without peer support attendance. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Community-dwelling burn survivors. Participants: Burn survivors (N=601) aged ≥18 years with injuries to ≥5% total body surface area (TBSA) or burns to critical areas (hands, feet, face, or genitals). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation Profile was used to examine the following previously validated 6 scale scores of social participation: Family and Friends, Social Interactions, Social Activities, Work and Employment, Romantic Relationships, and Sexual Relationships. Results: Burn support group attendance was reported by 330 (55%) of 596 respondents who responded to this item. Attendees had larger burn size (43.4%±23.6% vs 36.8%±23.4% TBSA burned, P<.01) and were more likely to be >10 years from injury (50% vs 42.5%, P<.01). Survivors who attended at least 1 support group scored significantly higher on 3 of the scales: Social Interactions (P=.01), Social Activities (P=.04), and Work and Employment (P=.05). In adjusted analyses, peer support attendance was associated with increased scores on the Social Interactions scale, increasing scores by 17% of an SD (95% confidence interval, 1%–33%; P=.04). Conclusions: Burn survivors who reported peer support attendance had better social interaction scores than those who did not. This is the first reported association between peer support group attendance and improvements in community reintegration in burn survivors. This cross-sectional study prompts further exploration into the potential benefits of peer support groups on burn recovery with future intervention studies.
KW - Burns
KW - Community integration
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Social support
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040340113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.007
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 29097179
AN - SCOPUS:85040340113
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 101
SP - S92-S98
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 1
ER -