Malignant hepatic hilar tumors: Can ultrasonography be used as an alternative to angiography with CT arterial portography for determination of resectability?

Lucy E. Hann*, Yuman Fong, Craig D. Shriver, Jose F. Botet, Karen T. Brown, David S. Klimstra, Leslie H. Blumgart

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Nineteen consecutive patients with malignant hilar obstruction were imaged with angiography, CT portography, and ultrasonography with color and spectral Doppler technique; all had surgical pathologic correlation. At surgery, 12 of 19 patients (63%) were found to have portal vein involvement; 15 of 19 (79%) had parenchymal invasion; and 11 of 19 (58%) had lobar atrophy. Level of biliary obstruction was determined in seven of 19 patients (37%) without drainage catheters. No difference was found between ultrasonography and angiography with CT portography for diagnosis of atrophy, level of bile duct obstruction, hepatic involvement, or venous invasion. Extrahepatic metastases in nine of 19 patients (47%) were poorly predicted by both CT portography and ultrasonography.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-45
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1996
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bile ducts, neoplasm
  • Liver, neoplasms
  • Portal vein, stenosis
  • Portography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Malignant hepatic hilar tumors: Can ultrasonography be used as an alternative to angiography with CT arterial portography for determination of resectability?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this