Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Management of extremity fasciotomy sites prospective randomized evaluation of two techniques

  • Laura S. Johnson*
  • , Mitchell Chaar
  • , Chad G. Ball
  • , Sebastian Perez
  • , Jeffrey M. Nicholas
  • , Amy D. Wyrzykowski
  • , Grace S. Rozycki
  • , David V. Feliciano
  • , Christopher J. Dente
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Morbidity from the treatment of extremity compartment syndrome is underappreciated. Closure technique effectiveness has yet to be definitively established. Methods: A randomized non-blinded prospective study was performed involving patients who underwent an extremity fasciotomy following trauma. Shoelace wounds were strapped with vessel loops under tension and VAC wounds were treated with a standard KCI VAC dressing. After randomization, patients returned to the OR every 96 h until primarily closed or skin grafted. Results: 21 patients were consented for randomization with 11 (52%) successfully closed at the first re-operation. After interim analysis the study was closed early with 5/5 (100%) of wounds treated with the shoelace technique closed primarily and only 1/9 (11%) of VAC wounds closed primarily (p = 0.003). Overall primary closure was achieved in 74% of patients. Conclusions: Aggressive attempts at wound closure lead to an increased early closure rate. For wounds that remain open after the first re-operation, a simple shoelace technique is more successful than a wound VAC for achieving same hospital stay skin closure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)736-739
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume216
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Fasciotomy
  • Shoelace technique
  • Vacuum-assisted closure
  • Wound closure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management of extremity fasciotomy sites prospective randomized evaluation of two techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this