Management of traumatic lung injury: a western trauma association multicenter review

Riyad Karmy-Jones, Gregory J. Jurkovich, David V. Shatz, Susan Brundage, Mathew J. Wall, Sandra Engelhardt, David B. Hoyt, John Holcroft, M. Margaret Knudson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

118 Scopus citations


Improved outcomes following lung injury have been reported using “lung sparing” techniques. A retrospective multicenter 4-year review of patients who underwent lung resection following injury was performed. Resections were categorized as “minor” (suture, wedge resection, tractotomy) or “major” (lobectomy or pneumonectomy). Injury severity, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score, and outcome were recorded. One hundred forty-three patients (28 blunt, 115 penetrating) underwent lung resection after sustaining an injury. Minor resections were used in 75% of cases, in patients with less severe thoracic injury (chest AIS scores “minor” 3.8 ± 0.9 vs. “major” 4.3 ± 0.7, p = 0.02). Mortality increased with each step of increasing complexity of the surgical technique (RR, 1.8; CI, 1.4-2.2): suture alone, 9% mortality; tractotomy, 13%; wedge resection, 30%; lobectomy, 43%; and pneumonectomy, 50%. Regression analysis demonstrated that blunt mechanism, lower blood pressure at thoracotomy, and increasing amount of the lung resection were each independently associated with mortality. Blunt traumatic lung injury has higher mortality primarily due to associated extrathoracic injuries. Major resections are required more commonly than previously reported. While “minor” resections, if feasible, are associated with improved outcome, trauma surgeons should be facile in a wide range of technical procedures for the management of lung injuries.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1049-1053
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 2001
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Management of traumatic lung injury: a western trauma association multicenter review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this