TY - JOUR
T1 - Marked reduction in long-term cardiac deaths with aspirin after a coronary event
AU - Goldstein, Robert E.
AU - Andrews, Mark
AU - Hall, W. Jackson
AU - Moss, Arthur J.
N1 - Funding Information:
From the Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; and *Heart Research Follow-Up Program and Department of Biostatistics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York. A complete list of the participating institutions and investigators for the Multicenter Myocardial Ischemia Research Group appears in reference 5. This study was supported in part by Research Grant HL-38702 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maffland, and by grants from Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Summit, New Jersey; Mallinckrodt Medical, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri; Marquette Electronics, Inc., Milwaukee, Wisconsin; and Yanabe Seiyaku Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan. The opinions or assertions contained here are those of the authors. They do not reflect the views of the Department of Defense or the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
PY - 1996/8
Y1 - 1996/8
N2 - Objectives. We sought to assess the role of aspirin in a precisely defined cohort with coronary disease receiving current therapy. Background. Prior results suggest that aspirin modestly decreases cardiac mortality in patients with coronary disease. However, these findings reflect heterogeneous study conditions and earlier management strategies. Methods. We utilized findings from the Multicenter Study of Myocardial Ischemia, which enrolled 936 subjects 1 to 6 months after an acute myocardial infarction (n = 651 [70%]) or unstable angina (n = 285 [30%]). The follow- up period averaged 23 months, with treatment determined by referring physicians. Results. At enrollment, 751 patients (80%) took aspirin regularly, usually 250 to 325 mg/day. Before enrollment, 291 patients (31%) had thrombolysis, and 352 (38%) had coronary angioplasty. During follow-up, cardiac death occurred in 22 patients, all-cause mortality in 31 and cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction in 70. Each of these outcomes was significantly less frequent among aspirin users. Cardiac death rate was markedly reduced: 1.6% for aspirin users and 5.4% for nonusers (p = 0.005). These differences were not explained by imbalances in predictors of postinfarction risk or therapy other than aspirin (Cox hazard ratio 0.37, p = 0.023). They persisted at least 2 years after enrollment. The difference in mortality rate was particularly prominent after thrombolysis: 0.9% for aspirin users and 8.8% for nonusers (p = 0.004). Conclusions. Reduction in cardiac deaths among aspirin users is substantially greater than that reported previously. Although derived secondarily, our findings suggest that current practice leads to situations in which aspirin exerts a long-term, life-protecting action, particularly after thrombolysis.
AB - Objectives. We sought to assess the role of aspirin in a precisely defined cohort with coronary disease receiving current therapy. Background. Prior results suggest that aspirin modestly decreases cardiac mortality in patients with coronary disease. However, these findings reflect heterogeneous study conditions and earlier management strategies. Methods. We utilized findings from the Multicenter Study of Myocardial Ischemia, which enrolled 936 subjects 1 to 6 months after an acute myocardial infarction (n = 651 [70%]) or unstable angina (n = 285 [30%]). The follow- up period averaged 23 months, with treatment determined by referring physicians. Results. At enrollment, 751 patients (80%) took aspirin regularly, usually 250 to 325 mg/day. Before enrollment, 291 patients (31%) had thrombolysis, and 352 (38%) had coronary angioplasty. During follow-up, cardiac death occurred in 22 patients, all-cause mortality in 31 and cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction in 70. Each of these outcomes was significantly less frequent among aspirin users. Cardiac death rate was markedly reduced: 1.6% for aspirin users and 5.4% for nonusers (p = 0.005). These differences were not explained by imbalances in predictors of postinfarction risk or therapy other than aspirin (Cox hazard ratio 0.37, p = 0.023). They persisted at least 2 years after enrollment. The difference in mortality rate was particularly prominent after thrombolysis: 0.9% for aspirin users and 8.8% for nonusers (p = 0.004). Conclusions. Reduction in cardiac deaths among aspirin users is substantially greater than that reported previously. Although derived secondarily, our findings suggest that current practice leads to situations in which aspirin exerts a long-term, life-protecting action, particularly after thrombolysis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030220547&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00150-7
DO - 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00150-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 8800105
AN - SCOPUS:0030220547
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 28
SP - 326
EP - 330
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 2
ER -