Measuring Performance: Current Practices in Surgical Education

Pamela Andreatta*, Brenton Franklin, Matthew Bradley, Christopher Renninger, John Armstrong

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Assessment requirements within the domain of surgery are equal in complexity and scope to the performance domain itself. There are numerous performance requirements in each of the cognitive, motor, and affective dimensions, and equally complex requirements for integration across a broad spectrum of performance contexts. Current assessment practices largely focus on the cognitive dimensions; however, there are initiatives and developing trends that include assessment of motor and affective dimensions as training program components. Precision of measurement remains challenging in all performance dimensions, with concomitant constraints on the accuracy and justness of assessment outcomes as definitive confirmation of performance competency in the domain. Increasing the accuracy and precision of assessment instrumentation and defining explicit performance criteria within the domain will lead to improved assessment implementation and value to surgeons, patients, and other stakeholders.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationClinical Education for the Health Professions
Subtitle of host publicationTheory and Practice
PublisherSpringer Nature
Pages1177-1201
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9789811533440
ISBN (Print)9789811533433
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Assessment in surgery
  • Competency assessment
  • Performance assessment in surgery
  • Surgical assessment
  • Surgical performance assessment
  • Surgical performance dimensions
  • Surgical skills assessment
  • Testing in surgery

Cite this