Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Measuring satisfaction with orthotic and prosthetic devices

  • Callie E. Tyner
  • , Aaron J. Boulton
  • , Jerry Slotkin
  • , Pamela A. Kisala
  • , Ross Zafonte
  • , W. Lee Childers
  • , Christopher L. Dearth
  • , Josef Butkus
  • , David S. Tulsky*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a measure of satisfaction with orthoses and prostheses for the Limb Injury Measurement Battery for Quality of Life (LIMB-QOL). Methods: Items were developed to assess an individual’s satisfaction with, and emotional and physical assimilation of, an orthosis and/or prosthesis. Items covered topics of satisfaction with device performance and aesthetics as well as user adaptation to a device, including usage, fit, and comfort. A pool of 65 items was administered to 471 individuals in the LIMB-QOL field testing/calibration study. Item response theory was used to evaluate and calibrate the new items. Test–retest reliability after 1–2 weeks was evaluated in a subsample. Results: From the original pool, 39 items were removed for content and 11 items were removed due to differential item functioning by type of injury/limb loss and device (orthosis vs. prosthesis). Following psychometric analysis, 15 items were calibrated as an item bank. These items exhibited acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.95) and fit to a unidimensional model. The final 15-item bank has strong psychometric properties (test–retest reliability α = 0.79), can be administered as a computerized adaptive test or 7-item short form, and is applicable to upper and lower injuries, limb loss and reconstruction, and orthotic and prosthetic device users. Conclusion: The LIMB-QOL Satisfaction with Orthosis/Prosthesis is a reliable measure, with evidence for validity in individuals with a variety of limb-affecting injuries and sudden-onset illnesses, and thus can be used broadly following major extremity trauma, and would be ideal for large-scale monitoring of QOL outcomes, although further evaluation of the validity for individuals with dysvascular or degenerative conditions is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number259
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume35
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2026

Keywords

  • Amputees
  • Orthotic devices
  • Patient reported outcome measures
  • Prostheses and implants
  • Psychometrics
  • Quality of life

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring satisfaction with orthotic and prosthetic devices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this