TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanical characterization of adult stem cells from bone marrow and perivascular niches
AU - Ribeiro, Alexandre J.S.
AU - Tottey, Steven
AU - Taylor, Richard W.E.
AU - Bise, Ryoma
AU - Kanade, Takeo
AU - Badylak, Stephen F.
AU - Dahl, Kris Noel
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Portuguese Government—Ministry of Science and Higher Education ( 44299 FCT to A.R.), the NSF ( CBET 0954421 to K.D.) and the NIH ( 5R01 AR054940 to S.B.).
PY - 2012/4/30
Y1 - 2012/4/30
N2 - Therapies using adult stem cells often require mechanical manipulation such as injection or incorporation into scaffolds. However, force-induced rupture and mechanosensitivity of cells during manipulation is largely ignored. Here, we image cell mechanical structures and perform a biophysical characterization of three different types of human adult stem cells: bone marrow CD34+ hematopoietic, bone marrow mesenchymal and perivascular mesenchymal stem cells. We use micropipette aspiration to characterize cell mechanics and quantify deformation of subcellular structures under force and its contribution to global cell deformation. Our results suggest that CD34+ cells are mechanically suitable for injection systems since cells transition from solid- to fluid-like at constant aspiration pressure, probably due to a poorly developed actin cytoskeleton. Conversely, mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow and perivascular niches are more suitable for seeding into biomaterial scaffolds since they are mechanically robust and have developed cytoskeletal structures that may allow cellular stable attachment and motility through solid porous environments. Among these, perivascular stem cells cultured in 6% oxygen show a developed cytoskeleton but a more compliant nucleus, which can facilitate the penetration into pores of tissues or scaffolds. We confirm the relevance of our measurements using cell motility and migration assays and measure survival of injected cells. Since different types of adult stem cells can be used for similar applications, we suggest considering mechanical properties of stem cells to match optimal mechanical characteristics of therapies.
AB - Therapies using adult stem cells often require mechanical manipulation such as injection or incorporation into scaffolds. However, force-induced rupture and mechanosensitivity of cells during manipulation is largely ignored. Here, we image cell mechanical structures and perform a biophysical characterization of three different types of human adult stem cells: bone marrow CD34+ hematopoietic, bone marrow mesenchymal and perivascular mesenchymal stem cells. We use micropipette aspiration to characterize cell mechanics and quantify deformation of subcellular structures under force and its contribution to global cell deformation. Our results suggest that CD34+ cells are mechanically suitable for injection systems since cells transition from solid- to fluid-like at constant aspiration pressure, probably due to a poorly developed actin cytoskeleton. Conversely, mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow and perivascular niches are more suitable for seeding into biomaterial scaffolds since they are mechanically robust and have developed cytoskeletal structures that may allow cellular stable attachment and motility through solid porous environments. Among these, perivascular stem cells cultured in 6% oxygen show a developed cytoskeleton but a more compliant nucleus, which can facilitate the penetration into pores of tissues or scaffolds. We confirm the relevance of our measurements using cell motility and migration assays and measure survival of injected cells. Since different types of adult stem cells can be used for similar applications, we suggest considering mechanical properties of stem cells to match optimal mechanical characteristics of therapies.
KW - Cytoskeleton
KW - Injection
KW - Nucleoskeleton
KW - Regenerative medicine
KW - Stem cells
KW - Viscoelasticity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859616056&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.032
DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.032
M3 - Article
C2 - 22349118
AN - SCOPUS:84859616056
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 45
SP - 1280
EP - 1287
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
IS - 7
ER -