TY - JOUR
T1 - Methodology used to develop the minimum common data elements for surveillance and Reporting of Musculoskeletal Injuries in the MILitary (ROMMIL) statement
AU - Bullock, Garrett S.
AU - Fallowfield, Joanne L.
AU - de la Motte, Sarah J.
AU - Arden, Nigel
AU - Fisher, Ben
AU - Dooley, Adam
AU - Forrest, Neil
AU - Fraser, John J.
AU - Gourlay, Alysia
AU - Hando, Ben R.
AU - Harrison, Katherine
AU - Hayhurst, Debra
AU - Molloy, Joseph M.
AU - Newman, Phillip M.
AU - Robitaille, Eric
AU - Teyhen, Deydre S.
AU - Tiede, Jeffrey M.
AU - Williams, Emma
AU - Williams, Sandra
AU - Van Tiggelen, Damien
AU - Van Wyngaarden, Joshua J.
AU - Westrick, Richard B.
AU - Emery, Carolyn A.
AU - Collins, Gary S.
AU - Rhon, Daniel I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2025 Bullock GS et al.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: The objective was to summarize the methodology used to develop the international minimum data elements for surveillance and Reporting of Musculoskeletal Injuries in the MILitary (ROMMIL) statement. This is a recommended list of elements to be collected and reported when conducting injury surveillance research in military settings. Methods: A Delphi methodology was employed to reach consensus. Preliminary steps included conducting a literature review and surveying a convenience sample of military stakeholders to 1) identify barriers and facilitators of military musculoskeletal injury (MSKI) prevention programs, 2) identify relevant knowledge gaps, and 3) establish future research priorities. A sequential three-round Delphi consensus survey followed, including relevant stakeholders from militaries around the world, using results to conduct an asynchronous knowledge user meeting (mixture of in-person and live video conference and recording) to explore the level of agreement among subject matter experts. Knowledge users, including former and current military service members, civilian practitioners working in military health networks, and international subject matter experts having experience with policy, execution, or clinical investigation of MSKI mitigation programs, MSKI diagnoses, and MSKI risk factors in military settings. For each round, participants scored questions on a Likert scale of 1-5. Scores ranged from No Importance (1) to Strong Importance (5). Results: Literature review and surveys helped inform the scope of potential variables. Three rounds were necessary to reach minimum consensus. Ninety-five, 65, and 42 respondents participated in the first, second and third rounds, respectively. Conclusions: Achieving consensus across relevant knowledge users representing military organizations globally can be challenging. This paper details the methodology employed to reach consensus for a core minimum data elements checklist for conducting MSKI research in military settings and improve data harmonization and scalability efforts. These methods can be used as a resource to assist in future consensus endeavors of similar nature.
AB - Background: The objective was to summarize the methodology used to develop the international minimum data elements for surveillance and Reporting of Musculoskeletal Injuries in the MILitary (ROMMIL) statement. This is a recommended list of elements to be collected and reported when conducting injury surveillance research in military settings. Methods: A Delphi methodology was employed to reach consensus. Preliminary steps included conducting a literature review and surveying a convenience sample of military stakeholders to 1) identify barriers and facilitators of military musculoskeletal injury (MSKI) prevention programs, 2) identify relevant knowledge gaps, and 3) establish future research priorities. A sequential three-round Delphi consensus survey followed, including relevant stakeholders from militaries around the world, using results to conduct an asynchronous knowledge user meeting (mixture of in-person and live video conference and recording) to explore the level of agreement among subject matter experts. Knowledge users, including former and current military service members, civilian practitioners working in military health networks, and international subject matter experts having experience with policy, execution, or clinical investigation of MSKI mitigation programs, MSKI diagnoses, and MSKI risk factors in military settings. For each round, participants scored questions on a Likert scale of 1-5. Scores ranged from No Importance (1) to Strong Importance (5). Results: Literature review and surveys helped inform the scope of potential variables. Three rounds were necessary to reach minimum consensus. Ninety-five, 65, and 42 respondents participated in the first, second and third rounds, respectively. Conclusions: Achieving consensus across relevant knowledge users representing military organizations globally can be challenging. This paper details the methodology employed to reach consensus for a core minimum data elements checklist for conducting MSKI research in military settings and improve data harmonization and scalability efforts. These methods can be used as a resource to assist in future consensus endeavors of similar nature.
KW - Consensus
KW - Delphi
KW - Implementation Science
KW - Investigative Techniques
KW - Military
KW - Military Medicine
KW - Sports Medicine
KW - Wounds and Injuries
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85212245396
U2 - 10.12688/f1000research.152514.2
DO - 10.12688/f1000research.152514.2
M3 - Article
C2 - 39649840
AN - SCOPUS:85212245396
SN - 2046-1402
VL - 13
JO - F1000Research
JF - F1000Research
M1 - 1044
ER -