TY - JOUR
T1 - Military-Civilian Partnership to Advance Standards of Performance for Simulated Combat Trauma Medical Skills
T2 - Validation of Competency Thresholds
AU - the CMSS Consortium
AU - Patel, Bhavesh M.
AU - Nicholson, Susannah E.
AU - Okerman, Tiffany S.
AU - Lopreiato, Joseph O.
AU - Tisherman, Samuel
AU - Frisch, Adam
AU - Noel, Pierre
AU - Poropatich, Ronald
AU - Phrampus, Paul E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2026. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected]. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights)
PY - 2026/7/1
Y1 - 2026/7/1
N2 - Introduction: Combat casualty care requires standardized proficiency criteria to ensure readiness in austere environments, yet gaps persist in defining performance thresholds for critical trauma skills. The Combat Medical Skills Sustainment Consortium (CMSSC), a novel military-civilian collaboration, aimed to validate competency thresholds for 21 Department of Defense-identified trauma skills. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study (2022-2025) enrolled 1,495 military and civilian personnel across five academic centers, stratified by experience (novice, intermediate, expert). Skills, including cricothyroidotomy, whole blood transfusion, and ultrasound-guided vascular access, were assessed using validated checklists in Role 2-congruent simulations. Statistical analysis compared checklist performance against participant experience with a priori checklist scores estimated at 40% (novices) and 90% (experts). Results: Competency thresholds were established, ranging from 77% (mechanical ventilation) to 100% (handoff). Experts achieved 85%-98% proficiency across most skills, with novices at 34%-97%. A ceiling effect was observed for less complex skills consistent with the power law of practice. Conclusion: The Combat Medical Skills Sustainment Consortium validated standardized assessment tools, with potential to address readiness gaps through military-civilian synergy. Findings support consortium-guided curriculum development and highlight the need for longitudinal skill decay studies. Impact: This study sets a benchmark for trauma care skills assessment, facilitating rapid adoption across military and civilian settings.
AB - Introduction: Combat casualty care requires standardized proficiency criteria to ensure readiness in austere environments, yet gaps persist in defining performance thresholds for critical trauma skills. The Combat Medical Skills Sustainment Consortium (CMSSC), a novel military-civilian collaboration, aimed to validate competency thresholds for 21 Department of Defense-identified trauma skills. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study (2022-2025) enrolled 1,495 military and civilian personnel across five academic centers, stratified by experience (novice, intermediate, expert). Skills, including cricothyroidotomy, whole blood transfusion, and ultrasound-guided vascular access, were assessed using validated checklists in Role 2-congruent simulations. Statistical analysis compared checklist performance against participant experience with a priori checklist scores estimated at 40% (novices) and 90% (experts). Results: Competency thresholds were established, ranging from 77% (mechanical ventilation) to 100% (handoff). Experts achieved 85%-98% proficiency across most skills, with novices at 34%-97%. A ceiling effect was observed for less complex skills consistent with the power law of practice. Conclusion: The Combat Medical Skills Sustainment Consortium validated standardized assessment tools, with potential to address readiness gaps through military-civilian synergy. Findings support consortium-guided curriculum development and highlight the need for longitudinal skill decay studies. Impact: This study sets a benchmark for trauma care skills assessment, facilitating rapid adoption across military and civilian settings.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105046585934
U2 - 10.1093/milmed/usag118
DO - 10.1093/milmed/usag118
M3 - Article
C2 - 42560252
AN - SCOPUS:105046585934
SN - 0026-4075
VL - 191
SP - 435
EP - 443
JO - Military Medicine
JF - Military Medicine
ER -