Military-civilian partnerships and the clinical readiness mission: A preliminary study from the Military Health System and the American College of Surgeons

Daniel J. Grabo*, Jennifer M. Gurney, Lowell Parascandola, M. Margaret Knudson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND The Blue Book, published in conjunction with the Military Health System Strategic Partnership with the American College of Surgeons, serves as a reference manual for institutions wishing to establish a military-civilian partnership (MCP). To evaluate the applicability of the criteria contained in the Blue Book, we created a survey to be distributed to MCP military surgeons and their civilian host champions. METHODS E-mail surveys were sent to MCP military surgeons and civilian host champions. Military surgeons were queried about basic demographic information and aspects of the MCP including type, duration of assignment, onboarding, malpractice coverage, and billing for services. We gathered information on the role of military surgeons at the MCP, workload information, and trauma cases. The civilian host champions survey focused on institutional activities including trauma surgical volume, clinical and educational opportunities for the military surgeons, and exposure to research. Military-civilian partnership military surgeons and civilian host champions were questioned on program attributes: administrative support, budget, and profile of the program within the institution. RESULTS Ten MCP military surgeons and 7 host champions completed surveys. The majority of military surgeons were assigned to the MCP for a 3-year instructor role (90%), and most were trauma surgeons (80%). Clinical activities for the military surgeon were where 60% spent ≥13 weeks annually on trauma. Military surgeons identified host program support in academic growth, deployment preparation, and sense of value at the MCP as positive attributes. Civilian host champions unanimously reported that exposure to research, opportunities to lead trauma teams, dedicated intensive care unit time, and patient volume were positive program attributes. CONCLUSION This preliminary survey demonstrates that the criteria put forth in the Blue Book align with experiences of MCP military surgeons and host champions. Continued development of this survey and others like it may be useful in the MCP program selection and evaluation process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management; Level V.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S16-S21
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume93
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Blue Book
  • Military Health System Strategic Partnership with the American College of Surgeons
  • clinical readiness program
  • critical wartime specialties
  • military-civilian partnership

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Military-civilian partnerships and the clinical readiness mission: A preliminary study from the Military Health System and the American College of Surgeons'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this