TY - JOUR
T1 - Military Medical Student Specialty Preferences During the DHA Transition
T2 - A Retrospective Analysis
AU - Brooke, Zechariah S.
AU - Husson, Christopher M.
AU - Watkin, Rachel L.
AU - Swats, Kent
AU - Moran, Nicholas A.
AU - Raiciulescu, Sorana
AU - Witkop, Catherine T.
AU - Durning, Steven J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
2024.
PY - 2024/10/2
Y1 - 2024/10/2
N2 - BACKGROUND: The Military Health System is a unique subsector within the nation's Graduate Medical Education (GME), with a different incentive structure for specialty selection for military medical students compared with their civilian counterparts. Changes by the Defense Health Agency (DHA) in 2017 emphasized a shift in military GME to training "operational" medical specialties. This study sought to gain insight into military medical students' reactions to the 2017 DHA transition by examining whether students continued to select "operational" specialties at similar rates as well as whether students remained satisfied with attending medical school. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of Uniformed Services University (USU) post-match students from 2015 to 2020 using anonymized data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Graduation Questionnaire, separated into pre-DHA (2015-2017) and post-DHA (2018-2020) transition groups. RESULTS: Regarding both intent to practice an operational specialty and satisfaction with choosing medical school, there was no statistically significant difference between the preand post-DHA transition groups. CONCLUSIONS: Whether preor post-DHA transition, USU medical students demonstrated similar preferences for operational specialties as well as similar levels of satisfaction with medical school attendance, suggesting that this transition may not significantly influence medical students' career preferences nor blunt their desire to enter military medicine.
AB - BACKGROUND: The Military Health System is a unique subsector within the nation's Graduate Medical Education (GME), with a different incentive structure for specialty selection for military medical students compared with their civilian counterparts. Changes by the Defense Health Agency (DHA) in 2017 emphasized a shift in military GME to training "operational" medical specialties. This study sought to gain insight into military medical students' reactions to the 2017 DHA transition by examining whether students continued to select "operational" specialties at similar rates as well as whether students remained satisfied with attending medical school. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of Uniformed Services University (USU) post-match students from 2015 to 2020 using anonymized data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Graduation Questionnaire, separated into pre-DHA (2015-2017) and post-DHA (2018-2020) transition groups. RESULTS: Regarding both intent to practice an operational specialty and satisfaction with choosing medical school, there was no statistically significant difference between the preand post-DHA transition groups. CONCLUSIONS: Whether preor post-DHA transition, USU medical students demonstrated similar preferences for operational specialties as well as similar levels of satisfaction with medical school attendance, suggesting that this transition may not significantly influence medical students' career preferences nor blunt their desire to enter military medicine.
KW - Defense Health Agency
KW - Graduate Medical Education
KW - internship and residency
KW - medical education
KW - military medical students
KW - military medicine
KW - Uniformed Services University
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205603831&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.55460/IE0C-FFK0
DO - 10.55460/IE0C-FFK0
M3 - Article
C2 - 39243404
AN - SCOPUS:85205603831
SN - 1553-9768
VL - 24
SP - 18
EP - 23
JO - Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals
JF - Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals
IS - 3
ER -