TY - JOUR
T1 - Military telehealth
T2 - A model for delivering expertise to the point of need in austere and operational environments
AU - Pamplin, Jeremy C.
AU - Davis, Konrad L.
AU - Mbuthia, Jennifer
AU - Cain, Steven
AU - Hipp, Sean J.
AU - Yourk, Daniel J.
AU - Colombo, Christopher J.
AU - Poropatich, Ron
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Project HOPE-The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Austere clinical environments are those in which limited resources hamper the achievement of optimal patient outcomes. Operational environments are those in which caregivers and resources are at risk for harm. Military and civilian caregivers experience these environments in the context of war, natural disasters, humanitarian assistance missions, and mass casualty events. The military has a particular interest in enhancing local caregiver capabilities within austere and operational environments to improve casualty outcomes when evacuation is delayed or impossible, reduce the cost and the risk of unnecessary evacuations, enhance the medical response during aid missions, and increase combat effectiveness by keeping service members in the fight as long as possible. This article describes military telehealth as it relates to care in austere and operational environments, and it suggests implications for policy, particularly with respect to the current emphasis on telehealth solutions that might not be feasible in those settings.
AB - Austere clinical environments are those in which limited resources hamper the achievement of optimal patient outcomes. Operational environments are those in which caregivers and resources are at risk for harm. Military and civilian caregivers experience these environments in the context of war, natural disasters, humanitarian assistance missions, and mass casualty events. The military has a particular interest in enhancing local caregiver capabilities within austere and operational environments to improve casualty outcomes when evacuation is delayed or impossible, reduce the cost and the risk of unnecessary evacuations, enhance the medical response during aid missions, and increase combat effectiveness by keeping service members in the fight as long as possible. This article describes military telehealth as it relates to care in austere and operational environments, and it suggests implications for policy, particularly with respect to the current emphasis on telehealth solutions that might not be feasible in those settings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071171646&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00273
DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00273
M3 - Article
C2 - 31381391
AN - SCOPUS:85071171646
SN - 0278-2715
VL - 38
SP - 1386
EP - 1392
JO - Health Affairs
JF - Health Affairs
IS - 8
ER -