Moderate- to High-grade Blunt Liver and Spleen Injuries Warrant Repeat Imaging to Identify Treatable Complications Results of the Radiographic Evaluation of Delayed Solid Organ Complications EAST Multicenter Trial

Lindsey L. Perea*, Kelsey L. Fletcher, Madison E. Morgan, Allison G. McNickle, Douglas Fraser, Martin Rosenthal, Ethan Wang, Anna Goldenberg, Emily Hancin, Alison A. Smith, Jack A. Leoni, Jonathan P. Meizoso, Christopher F. O’Neil, Matthew Noorbakhsh, Khalid Almahmoud, David Lapham, Erica Sais, Daniel Cullinane, Carolyne Falank, Adrian A. MaungBishwajit Bhattacharya, Paul Bjordahl, Jenny Guido, Alexandra Dixon, Amanda Carlson, Pascal Udekwu, Chloe Shell, Jaroslaw W. Bilaniuk, Zoltan H. Nemeth, Christopher A. Butts, Julia Zorn, Mentor Ahmeti, Steven Briggs, James M. Haan, Kelly Lightwine, John Oh, Gary Marshall, Morgan Collom, Richard Lewis, Greggory Davis, Asanthi Ratnasekera, Oluwadara Okorafor, Meaghan Broderick, Rishi Kundi, Thomas Muse, Charmi Mehta, Michael Collins, Jeffrey Lawrence, Lewis A. Jacobson, Jamie Williams, Kaily Ewing, Joel Narveson, Mark Lieser, Jill Streams, Stephen Gadomski, John D. Berne, Dalier Rodriguez Mederos, Amanda L. Teichman, Rachel L. Choron, Jennifer Grant, Nicole Frederick, David Evans, Stephanie Doris, Dane Scantling, Aksel Laudon, Patrick Craft, Jordan Kirsch, William Brigode, Johanna S. Stecher, Jeffry Nahmias, Claudia Alvarez, Vasileios Mousafeiris, Francesk Mulita, Morgan Turcotte, Tyler Holliday, Christopher P. Michetti, Nina Glass, Alexandra Jackovich, Brittany Bankhead, Brevin Thompson, Sharfuddin Chowdhury, Brian Thurston, Carolyn Bailey, Kellie Bresz, Michael Horst, Andrew Bernard, Joshua P. Hazelton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess whether blunt liver (BLI) and blunt spleen (BSI) injury patients benefit from repeat imaging to identify injury-related complications. Background: No consensus guidelines exist regarding the necessity of, or optimal timing for, repeat imaging in BLI and BSI patients undergoing nonoperative management (NOM). We hypothesize that scheduled repeat imaging of patients undergoing NOM for moderate- to high-grade BLI and BSI would result in identification of complications earlier than if repeat imaging is performed in response to a change in clinical condition. Methods: We performed a 4-year, 43-center, multinational, prospective observational study of adult patients undergoing initial NOM of BLI and/or BSI. Patients were grouped by reason for repeat imaging: scheduled imaging (SI) or imaging performed for clinical change (CC), and by whether findings on repeat imaging resulted in procedural or operative intervention. Results: We identified 2341 BLI and 2143 BSI patients (528 concomitant BLI/BSI). Repeat imaging was performed in 822 (35.1%) BLI patients [SI: 457 (55.5%), CC: 365 (44.5%)] and 758 (27.9%) BSI patients [SI: 478 (63.1%), CC: 280 (37.0%)]. Complications were identified on repeat imaging in BLI: 167 (7.1%) [SI: 72 (43.1%), CC: 95 (56.9%)] and BSI: 203 (7.5%) [SI: 91 (44.8%), CC: 112 (55.2%)]. Of patients with BLI complications, 96 (57.8%) [SI: 37 (38.5%), CC: 59 (61.5%)] underwent an intervention. Of patients with BSI complications, 133 (65.5%) [SI: 56 (42.1%), CC: 77 (57.9%)] underwent an intervention. Our data demonstrate that in BLI and BSI, most complications were identified within 48 to 72 hours. Conclusions: Scheduled repeat imaging for asymptomatic patients with BLI grade 4 to 5 and BSI grade 3 to 5 within 48 to 72 hours from time of diagnosis allows for identification of complications before a change in the patient’s clinical condition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)580-591
Number of pages12
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume282
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2025

Keywords

  • (Ann Surg 2025;282:580–591)
  • blunt liver injury
  • blunt spleen injury
  • delayed complications
  • nonoperative management
  • repeat imaging

Cite this