TY - JOUR
T1 - Modulation of vertical ground reaction impulse with real-time biofeedback
T2 - A feasibility study
AU - Golyski, Pawel R.
AU - Bell, Elizabeth M.
AU - Husson, Elizabeth M.
AU - Wolf, Erik J.
AU - Hendershot, Brad D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Human Kinetics, Inc.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - Given its apparent representation of cumulative (vs peak) loads, this feasibility study investigates vertical ground reaction impulse (vGRI) as a real-time biofeedback variable for gait training aimed at reducing lower limb loading. Fifteen uninjured participants (mean age = 27 y) completed 12 2-min trials, 1 at each combination of 4 walking speeds (1.0, 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6 m/s) and 3 targeted reductions in vGRI (5, 10, and 15%) of the assigned (“target”) limb, with the latter specified relative to an initial baseline (no feedback) condition at each speed. The ability to achieve targeted reductions was assessed using step-by-step errors between measured and targeted vGRI. Mean (SD) errors were 5.2% (3.7%); these were larger with faster walking speeds but consistent across reduction targets. Secondarily, we evaluated the strategy used to modulate reductions (ie, stance time or peak vertical ground reaction force [vGRF]) and the resultant influences on knee joint loading (external knee adduction moment [EKAM]). On the targeted limb, stance times decreased (P < .001) with increasing reduction target; first and second peaks in vGRF were similar (P > .104) across all target conditions. While these alterations did not significantly reduce EKAM on the target limb, future work in patients with knee pathologies is warranted.
AB - Given its apparent representation of cumulative (vs peak) loads, this feasibility study investigates vertical ground reaction impulse (vGRI) as a real-time biofeedback variable for gait training aimed at reducing lower limb loading. Fifteen uninjured participants (mean age = 27 y) completed 12 2-min trials, 1 at each combination of 4 walking speeds (1.0, 1.2, 1.4, and 1.6 m/s) and 3 targeted reductions in vGRI (5, 10, and 15%) of the assigned (“target”) limb, with the latter specified relative to an initial baseline (no feedback) condition at each speed. The ability to achieve targeted reductions was assessed using step-by-step errors between measured and targeted vGRI. Mean (SD) errors were 5.2% (3.7%); these were larger with faster walking speeds but consistent across reduction targets. Secondarily, we evaluated the strategy used to modulate reductions (ie, stance time or peak vertical ground reaction force [vGRF]) and the resultant influences on knee joint loading (external knee adduction moment [EKAM]). On the targeted limb, stance times decreased (P < .001) with increasing reduction target; first and second peaks in vGRF were similar (P > .104) across all target conditions. While these alterations did not significantly reduce EKAM on the target limb, future work in patients with knee pathologies is warranted.
KW - Biomechanics
KW - Gait training
KW - Knee
KW - Rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046994013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jab.2017-0004
DO - 10.1123/jab.2017-0004
M3 - Article
C2 - 29091540
AN - SCOPUS:85046994013
SN - 1065-8483
VL - 34
SP - 134
EP - 140
JO - Journal of Applied Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Applied Biomechanics
IS - 2
ER -