TY - JOUR
T1 - More Than Reducing Complexity
T2 - Canadian Specialists’ Views of the Royal College’s Maintenance of Certification Framework and Program
AU - Horsley, Tanya
AU - Moreau, Katherine
AU - Lockyer, Jocelyn
AU - Zeiter, Jeanie
AU - Varpio, Lara
AU - Campbell, Craig
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Alliance for Continuing Education in the Health Professions, the Association for Hospital Medical Education, and the Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Introduction: Maintenance of Certification (MOC) programs are facing competing pressures from physicians and regulators to design and deliver systems that ensure physicians sustain or maintain competence postcertification. Adding to these pressures is an emerging discourse of dissatisfaction by physicians participating in MOC programs suggesting physicians themselves are seeking programs that are relevant to their scope of practice. The object was to determine Canadian specialists’ views of a redesigned Royal College of Physician and Surgeons of Canada’s MOC program in five priority areas: complexity, motivation, impact, credit sufficiency, and enhancement. Methods: A national, cross-specialty, survey of Royal College of Physician and Surgeons of Canada’s MOC program users who had participated for at least 1 year. Results: Five thousand two hundred fifty nine respondents were included in the analysis. A majority of participates either “agreed” (2258, 43%) or “strongly agreed” (631, 12%) that the new framework was simpler to understand and the redesigned submission templates were simpler to use (“agree” 2297 [43.7%], “strongly agree” 701 [13.3%]). A total of 64.5% had a good understanding of the program purposes; however, some respondents believe the program does not yet deliver intended outcomes. Maintaining Fellowship designation, regulatory requirements, and a desire to remain up-to-date were indicated as the primary motivators for engaging in MOC. The program has had a modest influence on users’ approach to lifelong learning (“neither agree nor disagree”). Discussion: The program redesign reduced the perceived complexity of the MOC framework however it is described by some, as additional work (an add-on) by necessitating the documentation of participation in learning activities. An important “disconnect” between the program purposes and how physicians operationalize engagement was also illuminated by our study. Further attention needs to be paid to shifting the culture of continuing professional development to one that enables physicians to sufficiently demonstrate their continuing competence and enhanced performance meaningfully through participation in MOC programs.
AB - Introduction: Maintenance of Certification (MOC) programs are facing competing pressures from physicians and regulators to design and deliver systems that ensure physicians sustain or maintain competence postcertification. Adding to these pressures is an emerging discourse of dissatisfaction by physicians participating in MOC programs suggesting physicians themselves are seeking programs that are relevant to their scope of practice. The object was to determine Canadian specialists’ views of a redesigned Royal College of Physician and Surgeons of Canada’s MOC program in five priority areas: complexity, motivation, impact, credit sufficiency, and enhancement. Methods: A national, cross-specialty, survey of Royal College of Physician and Surgeons of Canada’s MOC program users who had participated for at least 1 year. Results: Five thousand two hundred fifty nine respondents were included in the analysis. A majority of participates either “agreed” (2258, 43%) or “strongly agreed” (631, 12%) that the new framework was simpler to understand and the redesigned submission templates were simpler to use (“agree” 2297 [43.7%], “strongly agree” 701 [13.3%]). A total of 64.5% had a good understanding of the program purposes; however, some respondents believe the program does not yet deliver intended outcomes. Maintaining Fellowship designation, regulatory requirements, and a desire to remain up-to-date were indicated as the primary motivators for engaging in MOC. The program has had a modest influence on users’ approach to lifelong learning (“neither agree nor disagree”). Discussion: The program redesign reduced the perceived complexity of the MOC framework however it is described by some, as additional work (an add-on) by necessitating the documentation of participation in learning activities. An important “disconnect” between the program purposes and how physicians operationalize engagement was also illuminated by our study. Further attention needs to be paid to shifting the culture of continuing professional development to one that enables physicians to sufficiently demonstrate their continuing competence and enhanced performance meaningfully through participation in MOC programs.
KW - Eportfolio
KW - Maintenance of certification
KW - National survey
KW - Specialist physicians
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038355540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000099
DO - 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000099
M3 - Article
C2 - 27583991
AN - SCOPUS:85038355540
SN - 0894-1912
VL - 36
SP - 157
EP - 163
JO - Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
JF - Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
IS - 3
ER -