TY - JOUR
T1 - Multidimensional machine learning models predicting outcomes after trauma
AU - Moris, Dimitrios
AU - Henao, Ricardo
AU - Hensman, Hannah
AU - Stempora, Linda
AU - Chasse, Scott
AU - Schobel, Seth
AU - Dente, Christopher J.
AU - Kirk, Allan D.
AU - Elster, Eric
N1 - Funding Information:
Research activities leading to the development of this manuscript were funded by the Department of Defense’s Defense Health Program- USU Cooperative Agreement (HU0001–15-2–0001).USU-WRNMMC Surgery and HJF: The contents of this manuscript are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or policies of Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., the Department of Defense (DoD) or the Departments of the Army, Navy, or Air Force. Mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Funding Information:
Research activities leading to the development of this manuscript were funded by the Department of Defense's Defense Health Program-USU Cooperative Agreement (HU0001–15-2–0001).USU-WRNMMC Surgery and HJF: The contents of this manuscript are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or policies of Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS), The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., the Department of Defense (DoD) or the Departments of the Army, Navy, or Air Force. Mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Dr Elster and Dr Kirk had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Concept and design: Dimitrios Moris, Seth Schobel, Allan D. Kirk, Eric Elster. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Ricardo Henao, Hannah Hensman, Linda Stempora, Scott Chasse. Drafting of the manuscript: Dimitrios Moris, Ricardo Henao, Seth Schobel. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Allan D. Kirk, Seth Schobel, Eric Elster. Statistical analysis: Ricardo Henao, Hannah Hensman. Obtained funding: Eric Elster. Administrative, technical, or material support: Seth Schobel, Ricardo Henao, Hannah Hensman, Scott Chasse. Supervision: Allan D. Kirk, Eric Elster.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: An emerging body of literature supports the role of individualized prognostic tools to guide the management of patients after trauma. The aim of this study was to develop advanced modeling tools from multidimensional data sources, including immunological analytes and clinical and administrative data, to predict outcomes in trauma patients. Methods: This was a prospective study of trauma patients at Level 1 centers from 2015 to 2019. Clinical, flow cytometry, and serum cytokine data were collected within 48 hours of admission. Sparse logistic regression models were developed, jointly selecting predictors and estimating the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia, acute kidney injury, complicated disposition (death, rehabilitation, or nursing facility), and return to the operating room. Model parameters (regularization controlling model sparsity) and performance estimation were obtained via nested leave-one-out cross-validation. Results: A total of 179 patients were included. The incidences of ventilator-associated pneumonia, acute kidney injury, complicated disposition, and return to the operating room were 17.7%, 28.8%, 22.5%, and 12.3%, respectively. Regarding extensive resource use, 30.7% of patients had prolonged intensive care unit stay, 73.2% had prolonged length of stay, and 23.5% had need for prolonged ventilatory support. The models were developed and cross-validated for ventilator-associated pneumonia, acute kidney injury, complicated dispositions, and return to the operating room, yielding predictive areas under the curve from 0.70 to 0.91. Each model derived its optimal predictive value by combining clinical, administrative, and immunological analyte data. Conclusion: Clinical, immunological, and administrative data can be combined to predict post-traumatic outcomes and resource use. Multidimensional machine learning modeling can identify trauma patients with complicated clinical trajectories and high resource needs.
AB - Background: An emerging body of literature supports the role of individualized prognostic tools to guide the management of patients after trauma. The aim of this study was to develop advanced modeling tools from multidimensional data sources, including immunological analytes and clinical and administrative data, to predict outcomes in trauma patients. Methods: This was a prospective study of trauma patients at Level 1 centers from 2015 to 2019. Clinical, flow cytometry, and serum cytokine data were collected within 48 hours of admission. Sparse logistic regression models were developed, jointly selecting predictors and estimating the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia, acute kidney injury, complicated disposition (death, rehabilitation, or nursing facility), and return to the operating room. Model parameters (regularization controlling model sparsity) and performance estimation were obtained via nested leave-one-out cross-validation. Results: A total of 179 patients were included. The incidences of ventilator-associated pneumonia, acute kidney injury, complicated disposition, and return to the operating room were 17.7%, 28.8%, 22.5%, and 12.3%, respectively. Regarding extensive resource use, 30.7% of patients had prolonged intensive care unit stay, 73.2% had prolonged length of stay, and 23.5% had need for prolonged ventilatory support. The models were developed and cross-validated for ventilator-associated pneumonia, acute kidney injury, complicated dispositions, and return to the operating room, yielding predictive areas under the curve from 0.70 to 0.91. Each model derived its optimal predictive value by combining clinical, administrative, and immunological analyte data. Conclusion: Clinical, immunological, and administrative data can be combined to predict post-traumatic outcomes and resource use. Multidimensional machine learning modeling can identify trauma patients with complicated clinical trajectories and high resource needs.
KW - Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis
KW - Humans
KW - Logistic Models
KW - Machine Learning
KW - Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/diagnosis
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Retrospective Studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138190932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2022.08.007
DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2022.08.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 36116976
AN - SCOPUS:85138190932
SN - 0039-6060
VL - 172
SP - 1851
EP - 1859
JO - Surgery
JF - Surgery
IS - 6
ER -