Neonatologists’ preferences regarding guidelines for periviable deliveries: do we really know what we want?

Jeanne A. Krick*, Dalia M. Feltman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To examine neonatology providers’ preferences regarding periviability guidelines. Study design: An online cross-sectional survey of American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine members. Results: Most of the 480 respondents desired standardized guidelines for upper (85%) and lower (87%) gestational age limits for offering resuscitation and comfort care. Standardization was most to least frequently desired at the national, institutional, and regional levels. Within scenarios involving parents’ preferences conflicting with institutional guidelines, respondents chose parent-preferred options more often (66 vs. 34%). Overall, resuscitation (48%) versus comfort care (52%) were nearly equally chosen. In emergency scenarios, more versus less experienced respondents favored parent-preferred options over guidelines (55 vs. 46%, p = 0.003) and chose resuscitation over comfort care (50 vs. 36%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Neonatal providers desire age-based periviability guidelines, but do not agree on the level of standardization. Such limits may be insufficient to guide clinical practice. Policies should include processes that direct providers through fair transparent decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)445-452
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Perinatology
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2019

Cite this