Neural basis of nonanalytical reasoning expertise during clinical evaluation

Steven J. Durning*, Michelle E. Costanzo, Anthony R. Artino, John Graner, Cees van der Vleuten, Thomas J. Beckman, Christopher M. Wittich, Michael J. Roy, Eric S. Holmboe, Lambert Schuwirth

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations


Introduction: Understanding clinical reasoning is essential for patient care and medical education. Dual-processing theory suggests that nonanalytic reasoning is an essential aspect of expertise; however, assessing nonanalytic reasoning is challenging because it is believed to occur on the subconscious level. This assumption makes concurrent verbal protocols less reliable assessment tools. Methods: Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to explore the neural basis of nonanalytic reasoning in internal medicine interns (novices) and board-certified staff internists (experts) while completing United States Medical Licensing Examination and American Board of Internal Medicine multiple-choice questions. Results: The results demonstrated that novices and experts share a common neural network in addition to nonoverlapping neural resources. However, experts manifested greater neural processing efficiency in regions such as the prefrontal cortex during nonanalytical reasoning. Conclusions: These findings reveal a multinetwork system that supports the dual-process mode of expert clinical reasoning during medical evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10
Number of pages1
JournalBrain and Behavior
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2015
Externally publishedYes


  • Dual-process theory
  • Expertise
  • Functional MRI
  • Medical education
  • Neural efficiency
  • Nonanalytical reasoning


Dive into the research topics of 'Neural basis of nonanalytical reasoning expertise during clinical evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this