Neutralization sensitivity of a novel HIV-1 CRF01_AE panel of infectious molecular clones

Agnes Laurence Chenine, Melanie Merbah, Lindsay Wieczorek, Sebastian Molnar, Brendan Mann, Jenica Lee, Anne Marie O’Sullivan, Meera Bose, Eric Sanders-Buell, Gustavo H. Kijak, Carolina Herrera, Robert McLinden, Robert J. O’Connell, Nelson L. Michael, Merlin L. Robb, Jerome H. Kim, Victoria R. Polonis, Sodsai Tovanabutra*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: HIV-1 CRF01_AE is dominant in Thailand where RV144 vaccine trial was conducted. To study immune correlates of protection in ongoing trials, CRF01_AE-derived reagents are essential. Here, we present a panel of 14 HIV-1 infectious molecular clones (IMCs) identified from different stages of infection and characterization of their neutralization sensitivity using 2 standard assays. Methods: One full-length IMC was constructed using a transmitted-founder virus to express Renilla luciferase (LucR) reporter gene and full-length envelopes (envs) of exogenous HIV-1. A panel of IMCs was generated, expressing envs of viruses from acute (Fiebig stages I/II and I-IV) and chronic (.Fiebig VI) infection. Neutralization assays were performed using TZM-bl or A3R5 cell lines, and sera or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Wilcoxon matched-paired test was used to assess neutralization differences between assays and reagents; correlation coefficients were evaluated by linear regression. Results: Neutralization potency observed was significantly higher in the A3R5 assay when testing mAbs and serum pools (P, 0.0001); the stage of infection from which env was derived did not associate with IMC neutralization sensitivity. Neutralization values from A3R5 and TZM-bl assays were strongly correlated when mAbs were tested (R2 = 0.7, P, 0.0001), but a weaker association was seen with serum pools (R2 = 0.17, P = 0.03). Conclusions: This novel panel of CRF01_AE reporter IMC is useful for assessing vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies in multiple assays, including those using primary cell targets. The significant differences in TZM-bl and A3R5 neutralization sensitivity, as well as the poor association when using polyclonal sera indicates the need for caution in choosing one specific platform.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)348-355
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Volume78
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • A3R5
  • CRF01_AE
  • HIV-1
  • Infectious molecular clone
  • Neutralization assay
  • TZM-bl

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neutralization sensitivity of a novel HIV-1 CRF01_AE panel of infectious molecular clones'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this