TY - JOUR
T1 - New therapeutic developments against Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli
AU - Melton-Celsa, Angela R.
AU - O'Brien, Alison D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is an etiologic agent of bloody diarrhea. A serious sequela of disease, the hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) may arise in up to 25% of patients. The development of HUS after STEC infection is linked to the presence of Stx. STEC strains may produce one or more Stxs, and the Stxs come in two major immunological groups, Stx1 and Stx2. A multitude of possible therapeutics designed to inhibit the actions of the Stxs have been developed over the past 30 years. Such therapeutics are important because antibiotic treatment of STEC infections is contraindicated due to an increased potential for development of HUS. The reason for the increased risk of HUS after antibiotic treatment is likely because certain antibiotics induce expression of the Stxs, which are generally associated with lysogenic bacteriophages. There are a few potential therapeutics that either try to kill STEC without inducing Stx expression or target gene expression within STEC. However, the vast majority of the treatments under development are designed to limit Stx receptor generation or to prevent toxin binding, trafficking, processing, or activity within the cell. The potential therapies described in this review include some that have only been tested in vitro and several that demonstrate efficacy in animals. The therapeutics that are currently the furthest along in development (completed phase I and II trials) are monoclonal antibodies directed against Stx1 and Stx2.
AB - Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is an etiologic agent of bloody diarrhea. A serious sequela of disease, the hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) may arise in up to 25% of patients. The development of HUS after STEC infection is linked to the presence of Stx. STEC strains may produce one or more Stxs, and the Stxs come in two major immunological groups, Stx1 and Stx2. A multitude of possible therapeutics designed to inhibit the actions of the Stxs have been developed over the past 30 years. Such therapeutics are important because antibiotic treatment of STEC infections is contraindicated due to an increased potential for development of HUS. The reason for the increased risk of HUS after antibiotic treatment is likely because certain antibiotics induce expression of the Stxs, which are generally associated with lysogenic bacteriophages. There are a few potential therapeutics that either try to kill STEC without inducing Stx expression or target gene expression within STEC. However, the vast majority of the treatments under development are designed to limit Stx receptor generation or to prevent toxin binding, trafficking, processing, or activity within the cell. The potential therapies described in this review include some that have only been tested in vitro and several that demonstrate efficacy in animals. The therapeutics that are currently the furthest along in development (completed phase I and II trials) are monoclonal antibodies directed against Stx1 and Stx2.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946096695&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1128/microbiolspec.EHEC-0013-2013
DO - 10.1128/microbiolspec.EHEC-0013-2013
M3 - Article
C2 - 26104346
AN - SCOPUS:84946096695
SN - 2165-0497
VL - 2
JO - Microbiology Spectrum
JF - Microbiology Spectrum
IS - 5
M1 - EHEC-0013-2013
ER -