Obesity negatively affects outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at four-year follow-up

Nata Parnes, John P. Scanaliato, John C. Dunn, Walter A. Fink, Alexis Sandler, Austin B. Fares*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose is to evaluate the influence of obesity (BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m2) on surgical outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed examining the outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in both a normal weight (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2) and an obese (BMI 30 to 39.9 kg/m2) patient population, specifically looking at functional outcomes and range of motion. Secondary variables analyzed were surgical time, complications, and medical comorbidities. Results: 52 normal weight patients (mean BMI 23.7 ± 2.1) and 59 obese patients (mean BMI 34.0 ± 2.4) were included. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in VAS, SANE and ASES scores (P < 0.0001), however there were significantly better outcomes in the normal weight group in VAS (0.56 ± 0.96 vs 1.42 ± 2.22; P = 0.0108), ASES (96.1 ± 5.8 vs 90.6 ± 15.6; P = 0.0192), and internal rotation (9.2 ± 3.0 vs 10.9 ± 2.3; P = 0.0010). Additionally, the obese cohort had more complications, longer surgical times, and a greater comorbid background. Conclusions: Obesity is associated with significantly more comorbid conditions, surgical complications, longer surgical time, and worse patient reported outcomes than normal weight patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-52
Number of pages7
JournalShoulder and Elbow
Volume15
Issue number4_suppl
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • arthroscopy
  • obesity
  • outcomes
  • rotator cuff
  • shoulder

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Obesity negatively affects outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at four-year follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this