Objective outcome measures: Collecting meaningful data on alopecia areata

Elise A. Olsen*, Janet Roberts, Leonard Sperling, Antonella Tosti, Jerry Shapiro, Amy McMichael, Wilma Bergfeld, Valerie Callender, Paradi Mirmirani, Ken Washenik, David Whiting, George Cotsarelis, Maria Hordinsky

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Although alopecia areata is a common disorder, it has no US Food and Drug Administration–approved treatment and evidence-based therapeutic data are lacking. Objective: To develop guidelines for the diagnosis, evaluation, assessment, response criteria, and end points for alopecia areata. Methods: Literature review and expert opinion of a group of dermatologists specializing in hair disorders. Results: Standardized methods of assessing and tracking hair loss and growth, including new scoring techniques, response criteria, and end points in alopecia areata are presented. Limitations: The additional time to perform the assessments is the primary limitation to use of the methodology in clinical practice. Conclusion: Use of these measures will facilitate collection of standardized outcome data on therapeutic agents used in alopecia areata both in clinical practice and in clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)470-478.e3
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume79
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ALODEX score
  • SALT score
  • alopecia areata
  • assessment measures
  • outcome measures
  • response criteria

Cite this