Outcomes and charges associated with outpatient inguinal hernia repair according to method of anesthesia and surgical approach

Adam L. Bourgon*, Justin P. Fox, Jonathan M. Saxe, Randy J. Woods

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background We conducted this study to compare short-term outcomes and charges between methods of hernia repair and anesthesia in the outpatient setting. Methods Using New York's state ambulatory surgery databases, we identified discharges for patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair. Patients were grouped by method of hernia repair. We compared hospital-based acute care encounters and total charges across groups. Results Locoregional anesthesia (5.2%) experienced a similar frequency of hospital-based acute care encounters within 30 days of discharge when compared with patients receiving general (6.0%) or having a laparoscopic procedure (6.0%). Risk-adjusted charges increased across groups (locoregional = $6,845 vs general = $7,839 vs laparoscopic = $11,340, P <.01). Conclusion Open inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia reduces healthcare charges.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)468-472
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume209
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ambulatory surgery
  • Anesthesia
  • Inguinal hernia
  • Outcomes
  • Readmission

Cite this