TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes Associated with Choice of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Open Fractures
AU - PREP-IT Investigators
AU - Lin, Carol A.
AU - Kobes, Tim
AU - Kholodovsky, Eric
AU - Hernandez, Giselle
AU - O'Hara, Nathan N.
AU - Schrank, Gregory M.
AU - O'Toole, Robert V.
AU - Slobogean, Gerard P.
AU - Sprague, Sheila
AU - Heng, Marilyn
AU - Slobogean, Gerard P.
AU - Sprague, Sheila
AU - Wells, Jeffrey
AU - Bhandari, Mohit
AU - Harris, Anthony D.
AU - Mullins, C. Daniel
AU - Thabane, Lehana
AU - Wood, Amber
AU - Della Rocca, Gregory J.
AU - Hebden, Joan
AU - O'Hara, Lyndsay M.
AU - Zura, Robert
AU - Lee, Christopher
AU - Patterson, Joseph
AU - Gardner, Michael J.
AU - Blasman, Jenna
AU - Davies, Jonah
AU - Liang, Stephen
AU - Taljaard, Monica
AU - Devereaux, P. J.
AU - Guyatt, Gordon H.
AU - Marvel, Debra
AU - Palmer, Jana
AU - Friedrich, Jeff
AU - Grissom, Frances
AU - D'Alleyrand, Jean Claude
AU - Rivera, Jessica
AU - Talbot, Max
AU - Joshi, Manjari G.
AU - Mossuto, Franca
AU - Medeiros, Michelle
AU - Polk, Genevieve
AU - Kettering, Eric
AU - Mahal, Nirmen
AU - Pogorzelski, David
AU - Dodds, Shannon
AU - Leonard, Jordan
AU - Li, Silvia
AU - Rojas, Alejandra
AU - Del Fabbro, Gina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 BY THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY, INCORPORATED.
PY - 2025/6/18
Y1 - 2025/6/18
N2 - Background:The ideal antibiotic prophylaxis for open fractures is unknown. We evaluated outcomes following different antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for open fractures.Methods:This is a secondary analysis of data from PREP-IT. Prophylactic antibiotics were defined as any intravenous antibiotic given on the day of admission. The outcomes were surgical site infection (SSI) within 90 days and reoperation within 1 year. Logistic regression and an instrumental variable analysis that leveraged site-level variation accounted for confounding. Subgroup variation was evaluated by stratifying by Gustilo-Anderson classification (Types I and II versus III).Results:Of the 3,331 included participants, the mean age was 45 ± 18 years, 63% were male, 73% were White, 21% were Black, 2% were Asian, and 10% were Hispanic. Cefazolin monotherapy (58% of patients), ceftriaxone monotherapy (10%), and cefazolin plus gentamicin (6%) were the most common regimens. In the instrumental variable analysis, the odds of infection did not significantly differ with ceftriaxone use (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 2.20; p = 0.45) or cefazolin plus gentamicin use (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.03 to 2.04; p = 0.20) compared with cefazolin monotherapy. There were no significant differences between the regimens with respect to infection when stratified by Gustilo-Anderson type. However, we did observe a nearly 3-fold increase in the odds of infection with ceftriaxone use compared with cefazolin monotherapy (OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 0.96 to 7.79; p = 0.06) in Type-I and II fractures, and a 75% decrease in the odds of infection with cefazolin plus gentamicin use (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.03 to 2.02; p = 0.19) compared with cefazolin monotherapy in Type-III fractures.Conclusions:Among patients with open fractures, antibiotic prophylaxis with ceftriaxone monotherapy did not provide significant benefits compared with cefazolin monotherapy in preventing infection in Type-I and II fractures. The findings suggest that cefazolin plus gentamicin might reduce the odds of infection in Type-III fractures compared with cefazolin monotherapy, but this difference was not statistically significant.
AB - Background:The ideal antibiotic prophylaxis for open fractures is unknown. We evaluated outcomes following different antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for open fractures.Methods:This is a secondary analysis of data from PREP-IT. Prophylactic antibiotics were defined as any intravenous antibiotic given on the day of admission. The outcomes were surgical site infection (SSI) within 90 days and reoperation within 1 year. Logistic regression and an instrumental variable analysis that leveraged site-level variation accounted for confounding. Subgroup variation was evaluated by stratifying by Gustilo-Anderson classification (Types I and II versus III).Results:Of the 3,331 included participants, the mean age was 45 ± 18 years, 63% were male, 73% were White, 21% were Black, 2% were Asian, and 10% were Hispanic. Cefazolin monotherapy (58% of patients), ceftriaxone monotherapy (10%), and cefazolin plus gentamicin (6%) were the most common regimens. In the instrumental variable analysis, the odds of infection did not significantly differ with ceftriaxone use (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 2.20; p = 0.45) or cefazolin plus gentamicin use (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.03 to 2.04; p = 0.20) compared with cefazolin monotherapy. There were no significant differences between the regimens with respect to infection when stratified by Gustilo-Anderson type. However, we did observe a nearly 3-fold increase in the odds of infection with ceftriaxone use compared with cefazolin monotherapy (OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 0.96 to 7.79; p = 0.06) in Type-I and II fractures, and a 75% decrease in the odds of infection with cefazolin plus gentamicin use (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.03 to 2.02; p = 0.19) compared with cefazolin monotherapy in Type-III fractures.Conclusions:Among patients with open fractures, antibiotic prophylaxis with ceftriaxone monotherapy did not provide significant benefits compared with cefazolin monotherapy in preventing infection in Type-I and II fractures. The findings suggest that cefazolin plus gentamicin might reduce the odds of infection in Type-III fractures compared with cefazolin monotherapy, but this difference was not statistically significant.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105009316827&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.24.01123
DO - 10.2106/JBJS.24.01123
M3 - Article
C2 - 40531169
AN - SCOPUS:105009316827
SN - 0021-9355
VL - 107
SP - 19
EP - 27
JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
IS - Suppl 1
ER -