Outcomes of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) mastery training standards applied to an ergonomically different, lower cost platform

Sarah B. Placek*, Brenton R. Franklin, Sarah M. Haviland, Mercy D. Wagner, Mary T. O’Donnell, Chad T. Cryer, Kristen D. Trinca, Elliott Silverman, E. Matthew Ritter

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Using previously established mastery learning standards, this study compares outcomes of training on standard FLS (FLS) equipment with training on an ergonomically different (ED-FLS), but more portable, lower cost platform. Methods: Subjects completed a pre-training FLS skills test on the standard platform and were then randomized to train on the FLS training platform (n = 20) or the ED-FLS platform (n = 19). A post-training FLS skills test was administered to both groups on the standard FLS platform. Results: Group performance on the pretest was similar. Fifty percent of FLS and 32 % of ED-FLS subjects completed the entire curriculum. 100 % of subjects completing the curriculum achieved passing scores on the post-training test. There was no statistically discernible difference in scores on the final FLS exam (FLS 93.4, ED-FLS 93.3, p = 0.98) or training sessions required to complete the curriculum (FLS 7.4, ED-FLS 9.8, p = 0.13). Conclusions: These results show that when applying mastery learning theory to an ergonomically different platform, skill transfer occurs at a high level and prepares subjects to pass the standard FLS skills test.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2616-2622
Number of pages7
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • FLS
  • Laparoscopy
  • Mastery learning
  • Simulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) mastery training standards applied to an ergonomically different, lower cost platform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this