TY - JOUR
T1 - Parasympathetic response in women with coronary vascular dysfunction during mental stress compared to those with non-cardiac chest pain and reference controls
AU - Mehta, Puja K.
AU - Sheikh, Shafa at A.
AU - Dave, Esha K.
AU - Shakoor, Rahim K.
AU - Torbati, Tina
AU - Shah, Amit
AU - Thames, Marc D.
AU - Qiang, Liu
AU - Ko, Yi An
AU - Wei, Janet
AU - Shufelt, Chrisandra
AU - Nelson, Michael D.
AU - Samuels, Bruce
AU - Azarbal, Babak
AU - Park, Jeanie
AU - Irwin, Michael R.
AU - Krantz, David S.
AU - Bairey Merz, C. Noel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - Background: Coronary vascular dysfunction (CVaD) contributes to ischemia even in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. We hypothesize that abnormal autonomic reactivity to mental stress is a key pathophysiologic mechanism in CVaD compared to non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) and reference control (RC) groups. Methods: Seventy women (35 with CVaD diagnosed by coronary function testing, 19 with NCCP, and 16 RC) underwent mental stress testing (arithmetic and anger recall) in the Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System study. RC group was asymptomatic with no risk factors and normal exercise treadmill testing. Frequency domain heart rate variability (HRV, ms2) was obtained at baseline and during mental stress, with high frequency (HF) power as an accepted parasympathetic measure. Low frequency (LF)/HF ratio may reflect sympathetic dominance. ANOVA was used for comparisons. Results: CVaD group was older compared to NCCP (57.1 ± 9.6 vs. 50.4 ± 11.3 years, p = 0.025, respectively), but age-matched to RC group (54.6 ± 14.5, p = 0.45). HRV was similar at baseline among the groups. During anger recall, CVaD group had lower HF HRV vs. NCCP (5.03 ± 1.05 vs 6.00 ± 1.17, p = 0.006, respectively), but not vs. RC (5.74 ± 1.02, p = 0.077). During arithmetic, CVaD group had lower HF HRV vs. NCCP (5.06 ± 1.12 vs. 6.00 ± 1.17, p = 0.007, respectively) and RC (6.04 ± 0.83, p = 0.01) groups. LF/HF ratio did not differ among the three groups. Conclusions: Women with CVaD demonstrate a greater stress-induced vagal withdrawal compared to those with NCCP and RC women. Further work to investigate altered autonomic responses as a mechanism in CVaD is warranted.
AB - Background: Coronary vascular dysfunction (CVaD) contributes to ischemia even in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. We hypothesize that abnormal autonomic reactivity to mental stress is a key pathophysiologic mechanism in CVaD compared to non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) and reference control (RC) groups. Methods: Seventy women (35 with CVaD diagnosed by coronary function testing, 19 with NCCP, and 16 RC) underwent mental stress testing (arithmetic and anger recall) in the Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System study. RC group was asymptomatic with no risk factors and normal exercise treadmill testing. Frequency domain heart rate variability (HRV, ms2) was obtained at baseline and during mental stress, with high frequency (HF) power as an accepted parasympathetic measure. Low frequency (LF)/HF ratio may reflect sympathetic dominance. ANOVA was used for comparisons. Results: CVaD group was older compared to NCCP (57.1 ± 9.6 vs. 50.4 ± 11.3 years, p = 0.025, respectively), but age-matched to RC group (54.6 ± 14.5, p = 0.45). HRV was similar at baseline among the groups. During anger recall, CVaD group had lower HF HRV vs. NCCP (5.03 ± 1.05 vs 6.00 ± 1.17, p = 0.006, respectively), but not vs. RC (5.74 ± 1.02, p = 0.077). During arithmetic, CVaD group had lower HF HRV vs. NCCP (5.06 ± 1.12 vs. 6.00 ± 1.17, p = 0.007, respectively) and RC (6.04 ± 0.83, p = 0.01) groups. LF/HF ratio did not differ among the three groups. Conclusions: Women with CVaD demonstrate a greater stress-induced vagal withdrawal compared to those with NCCP and RC women. Further work to investigate altered autonomic responses as a mechanism in CVaD is warranted.
KW - Coronary vascular dysfunction
KW - Heart rate variability
KW - Mental stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005182720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101673
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101673
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105005182720
SN - 2352-9067
VL - 59
JO - IJC Heart and Vasculature
JF - IJC Heart and Vasculature
M1 - 101673
ER -