Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Perception during use of force and the likelihood of firing upon an unarmed person

Adam T. Biggs, Joseph A. Hamilton, Andrew E. Jensen, Greg H. Huffman, Joel Suss, Timothy L. Dunn, Sarah Sherwood, Dale A. Hirsch, Jayson Rhoton, Karen R. Kelly, Rachel R. Markwald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Stress can impact perception, especially during use-of-force. Research efforts can thus advance both theory and practice by examining how perception during use-of-force might drive behavior. The current study explored the relationship between perceptual judgments and performance during novel close-combat training. Analyses included perceptual judgments from close-combat assessments conducted pre-training and post-training that required realistic use-of-force decisions in addition to an artificially construed stress-inoculation event used as a training exercise. Participants demonstrated significant reductions in situational awareness while under direct fire, which correlated to increased physiological stress. The initial likelihood of firing upon an unarmed person predicted the perceptual shortcomings of later stress-inoculation training. Subsequently, likelihood of firing upon an unarmed person was reduced following the stress-inoculation training. These preliminary findings have several implications for low or zero-cost solutions that might help trainers identify individuals who are underprepared for field responsibilities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13313
Number of pages1
JournalScientific Reports
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 25 Jun 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perception during use of force and the likelihood of firing upon an unarmed person'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this