TY - JOUR
T1 - Perception of Treatment Success and Impact on Function with Antibiotics or Appendectomy for Appendicitis
T2 - A Randomized Clinical Trial with an Observational Cohort
AU - Writing Group for the CODA Collaborative
AU - Thompson, Callie M.
AU - Voldal, Emily C.
AU - Davidson, Giana H.
AU - Sanchez, Sabrina E.
AU - Ayoung-Chee, Patricia
AU - Victory, Jesse
AU - Guiden, Mary
AU - Bizzell, Bonnie
AU - Glaser, Jacob
AU - Hults, Christopher
AU - Price, Thea P.
AU - Siparsky, Nicole
AU - Ohe, Kristin
AU - Mandell, Katherine A.
AU - DeUgarte, Daniel A.
AU - Kaji, Amy H.
AU - Uribe, Lisandra
AU - Kao, Lillian S.
AU - Mueck, Krislynn M.
AU - Farjah, Farhood
AU - Self, Wesley H.
AU - Clark, Sunday
AU - Drake, F. Thurston
AU - Fischkoff, Katherine
AU - Minko, Elizaveta
AU - Cuschieri, Joseph
AU - Faine, Brett
AU - Skeete, Dionne A.
AU - Dhanani, Naila
AU - Liang, Mike K.
AU - Krishnadasan, Anusha
AU - Talan, David A.
AU - Fannon, Erin
AU - Kessler, Larry G.
AU - Comstock, Bryan A.
AU - Heagerty, Patrick J.
AU - Monsell, Sarah E.
AU - Lawrence, Sarah O.
AU - Flum, David R.
AU - Lavallee, Danielle C.
AU - Parsons, Charles
AU - Shapiro, Nathan I.
AU - Odom, Stephen R.
AU - Cooper, Randall
AU - Tichter, Aleksandr
AU - Hayward, Alyssa
AU - Johnson, Jeffrey
AU - Patton, Joe H.
AU - Hayes, Lillian Adrianna
AU - Sohn, Vance
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
PY - 2023/6/1
Y1 - 2023/6/1
N2 - Objective: To compare secondary patient reported outcomes of perceptions of treatment success and function for patients treated for appendicitis with appendectomy vs. antibiotics at 30 days. Summary Background Data: The Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy trial found antibiotics noninferior to appendectomy based on 30-day health status. To address questions about outcomes among participants with lower socioeconomic status, we explored the relationship of sociodemographic and clinical factors and outcomes. Methods: We focused on 4 patient reported outcomes at 30 days: high decisional regret, dissatisfaction with treatment, problems performing usual activities, and missing >10 days of work. The randomized (RCT) and observational cohorts were pooled for exploration of baseline factors. The RCT cohort alone was used for comparison of treatments. Logistic regression was used to assess associations. Results: The pooled cohort contained 2062 participants; 1552 from the RCT. Overall, regret and dissatisfaction were low whereas problems with usual activities and prolonged missed work occurred more frequently. In the RCT, those assigned to antibiotics had more regret (Odd ratios (OR) 2.97, 95% Confidence intervals (CI) 2.05-4.31) and dissatisfaction (OR 1.98, 95%CI 1.25-3.12), and reported less missed work (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.27-0.56). Factors associated with function outcomes included sociodemographic and clinical variables for both treatment arms. Fewer factors were associated with dissatisfaction and regret. Conclusions: Overall, participants reported high satisfaction, low regret, and were frequently able to resume usual activities and return to work. When comparing treatments for appendicitis, no single measure defines success or failure for all people. The reported data may inform discussions regarding the most appropriate treatment for individuals. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02800785.
AB - Objective: To compare secondary patient reported outcomes of perceptions of treatment success and function for patients treated for appendicitis with appendectomy vs. antibiotics at 30 days. Summary Background Data: The Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy trial found antibiotics noninferior to appendectomy based on 30-day health status. To address questions about outcomes among participants with lower socioeconomic status, we explored the relationship of sociodemographic and clinical factors and outcomes. Methods: We focused on 4 patient reported outcomes at 30 days: high decisional regret, dissatisfaction with treatment, problems performing usual activities, and missing >10 days of work. The randomized (RCT) and observational cohorts were pooled for exploration of baseline factors. The RCT cohort alone was used for comparison of treatments. Logistic regression was used to assess associations. Results: The pooled cohort contained 2062 participants; 1552 from the RCT. Overall, regret and dissatisfaction were low whereas problems with usual activities and prolonged missed work occurred more frequently. In the RCT, those assigned to antibiotics had more regret (Odd ratios (OR) 2.97, 95% Confidence intervals (CI) 2.05-4.31) and dissatisfaction (OR 1.98, 95%CI 1.25-3.12), and reported less missed work (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.27-0.56). Factors associated with function outcomes included sociodemographic and clinical variables for both treatment arms. Fewer factors were associated with dissatisfaction and regret. Conclusions: Overall, participants reported high satisfaction, low regret, and were frequently able to resume usual activities and return to work. When comparing treatments for appendicitis, no single measure defines success or failure for all people. The reported data may inform discussions regarding the most appropriate treatment for individuals. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02800785.
KW - Comparison of Outcomes of antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy
KW - antibiotics
KW - appendectomy
KW - appendicitis
KW - clinical factors
KW - decisional regret
KW - dissatisfaction with treatment
KW - patient-reported outcomes
KW - sociodemographic factors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160274692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005458
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005458
M3 - Article
C2 - 35815898
AN - SCOPUS:85160274692
SN - 0003-4932
VL - 277
SP - 886
EP - 893
JO - Annals of surgery
JF - Annals of surgery
IS - 6
ER -