Perceptions of care following initiation of do-not-resuscitate orders

Kathryn E. Driggers*, Sydney E. Dishman, Kevin K. Chung, Cara H. Olsen, Andrea B. Ryan, Melissa M. McLawhorn, Laura S. Johnson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Documenting do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) can be controversial; some providers believe that DNR orders change care. This survey evaluates current perceptions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: IRB approved survey consisting of 31 validated questions divided into 3 factors (1. palliation, 2. active treatment, and 3. trust/communication). Individual questions were compared using Fisher's exact-tests and factors were compared via t-tests.

RESULTS: Both surgical and ICU staff believe care decreases after DNR order initiation (43%). More surgical staff report decreased care aggressiveness versus ICU staff (63% vs 25%, p < 0.005 and Factor 2, 25.8 versus 29.8, p < 0.001), and felt that electrical cardioversion outside of the setting of ACLS would not be performed (57% vs 24%, p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS: Surgical staff expressed more concern about care after DNR status than their ICU counterparts. Determining whether care actually changes clinically warrants further investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number154008
Pages (from-to)154008
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume69
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Advance care planning
  • Advance directives
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Critical care
  • Resuscitation orders
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Humans
  • Electric Countershock
  • Resuscitation Orders
  • Communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perceptions of care following initiation of do-not-resuscitate orders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this