Phleborheographic diagnosis of venous obstruction

G. J. Collins, N. M. Rich, C. A. Andersen, P. T. McDonald, L. Kozloff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Between February 1977 and May 1978, phleborheograms were done on 328 extremities. Interpretable tracings were obtained in 322 (98.2%). Results were positive for 102 extremities, negative for 220 extremities, and equivocal or uninterpretable for six extremities. Phlebograms as well as phleborheograms were done in 64 extremities. Phlebograms were positive in 41 and negative in 23. The overall agreement between the interpretations of the phlebograms and phleborheograms was 95.3%. The phleborheogram was positive in each case in which the phlebogram was positive. In three cases with negative phlebograms the phleborheogram was positive. Thus, the sensitivity was 100%, and the specificity was 87%. Phleborheography is a useful adjunct to the diagnosis of venous obstruction. It has a high degree of sensitivity (100% in our experience). Clinical correlation is necessary to determine the most likely cause of venous obstruction in individual cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-28
Number of pages4
JournalUnknown Journal
Volume189
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1979
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phleborheographic diagnosis of venous obstruction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this