TY - JOUR
T1 - Poor compliance despite equal access
T2 - Military experience with screening breast MRI in high risk women
AU - Do, Woo S.
AU - Weiss, Jessica B.
AU - McGregor, Helen F.
AU - Forte, Dominic M.
AU - Sheldon, Rowan R.
AU - Sohn, Vance Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - Background: Using the military as a model for an equal-access, no-cost healthcare system, we sought to (1) describe screening breast MRI compliance rates and (2) identify patient-perceived barriers to screening. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database at a tertiary level center, we compared compliance among women at ≥20% risk of developing breast cancer (Tyrer-Cuzick) and conducted structured phone interviews with women at ≥30% risk. Results: From 2015 to 2016, 1,052 women met criteria for screening MRI. Of these, only 251 (24%) underwent MRI screening. Compliance among women with a 20–24%, 25–29%, 30–39%, and ≥40% risk was 16%, 24%, 37%, and 51%, respectively (p < 0.02). 37 of 128 unique patients (29%) with ≥30% risk agreed to interview. 43% cited time/inconvenience as the key barrier to screening; 22% cited questions regarding screening recommendations; and only 3% cited fear/concerns as the key barrier. Conclusions: Even in an equal-access system, there is poor compliance in patients who are at high risk for developing breast cancer. Patients cited time/inconvenience and questions regarding screening as key barriers to screening.
AB - Background: Using the military as a model for an equal-access, no-cost healthcare system, we sought to (1) describe screening breast MRI compliance rates and (2) identify patient-perceived barriers to screening. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained database at a tertiary level center, we compared compliance among women at ≥20% risk of developing breast cancer (Tyrer-Cuzick) and conducted structured phone interviews with women at ≥30% risk. Results: From 2015 to 2016, 1,052 women met criteria for screening MRI. Of these, only 251 (24%) underwent MRI screening. Compliance among women with a 20–24%, 25–29%, 30–39%, and ≥40% risk was 16%, 24%, 37%, and 51%, respectively (p < 0.02). 37 of 128 unique patients (29%) with ≥30% risk agreed to interview. 43% cited time/inconvenience as the key barrier to screening; 22% cited questions regarding screening recommendations; and only 3% cited fear/concerns as the key barrier. Conclusions: Even in an equal-access system, there is poor compliance in patients who are at high risk for developing breast cancer. Patients cited time/inconvenience and questions regarding screening as key barriers to screening.
KW - Breast MRI
KW - Cancer screening
KW - Healthcare access
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062276007&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.02.021
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.02.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 30846162
AN - SCOPUS:85062276007
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 217
SP - 843
EP - 847
JO - American Journal of Surgery
JF - American Journal of Surgery
IS - 5
ER -