Power and influence styles in programme planning: Relationship with organizational political contexts

Baiyin Yang; Ronald M. Cervero

doi:10.1080/02601370110048827

Power and influence styles in programme planning: Relationship with organizational political contexts

Baiyin Yang
, Ronald M. Cervero

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between adult education practitioners using different styles of power and influence tactics in designing and planning programmes and organizational political contexts. Power and influence styles were identified through cluster analysis: shotgun, tactician, ingratiator, and bystander. The relationship between power and influence style and organizational political contexts was examined.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	289-296
Number of pages	8
Journal	International Journal of Lifelong Education
Volume	20
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370110048827
State	Published - 2001
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1080/02601370110048827

Cite this

@article{786de7215b414915918edd90db4e0a4f,

title = "Power and influence styles in programme planning: Relationship with organizational political contexts",

abstract = "This study explores the relationship between adult education practitioners using different styles of power and influence tactics in designing and planning programmes and organizational political contexts. Power and influence styles were identified through cluster analysis: shotgun, tactician, ingratiator, and bystander. The relationship between power and influence style and organizational political contexts was examined.",

author = "Baiyin Yang and Cervero, \{Ronald M.\}",

year = "2001",

doi = "10.1080/02601370110048827",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "289--296",

journal = "International Journal of Lifelong Education",

issn = "0260-1370",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power and influence styles in programme planning

T2 - Relationship with organizational political contexts

AU - Yang, Baiyin

AU - Cervero, Ronald M.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - This study explores the relationship between adult education practitioners using different styles of power and influence tactics in designing and planning programmes and organizational political contexts. Power and influence styles were identified through cluster analysis: shotgun, tactician, ingratiator, and bystander. The relationship between power and influence style and organizational political contexts was examined.

AB - This study explores the relationship between adult education practitioners using different styles of power and influence tactics in designing and planning programmes and organizational political contexts. Power and influence styles were identified through cluster analysis: shotgun, tactician, ingratiator, and bystander. The relationship between power and influence style and organizational political contexts was examined.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85006436723

U2 - 10.1080/02601370110048827

DO - 10.1080/02601370110048827

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85006436723

SN - 0260-1370

VL - 20

SP - 289

EP - 296

JO - International Journal of Lifelong Education

JF - International Journal of Lifelong Education

IS - 4

ER -

Power and influence styles in programme planning: Relationship with organizational political contexts

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this