Prevalence of CYP2D6 genotypes and predicted phenotypes in a cohort of cambodians at high risk for infections with plasmodium vivax

Michele D. Spring*, Chanthap Lon, Somethy Sok, Darapiseth Sea, Mariusz Wojnarski, Soklyda Chann, Worachet Kuntawunginn, Thay Kheang Heng, Samon Nou, Montri Arsanok, Sabaithip Sriwichai, Pattaraporn Vanachayangkul, Jessica T. Lin, Jessica E. Manning, Krisada Jongsakul, Sathit Pichyangkul, Prom Satharath, Philip L. Smith, Lek Dysoley, David L. SaundersNorman C. Waters

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Clinical failure of primaquine (PQ) has been demonstrated in people with CYP450 2D6 genetic polymorphisms that result in reduced or no enzyme activity. The distribution of CYP2D6 genotypes and predicted phenotypes in the Cambodian population is not well described. Surveys in other Asian countries have shown an approximate 50% prevalence of the reduced activity CYP2D6 allele *10, which could translate into increased risk of PQ radical cure failure and repeated relapses, making interruption of transmission and malaria elimination difficult to achieve. We determined CYP2D6 genotypes from 96 volunteers from Oddor Meanchey Province, Cambodia, an area endemic for Plasmodium vivax. We found a 54.2% frequency of the *10 allele, but in approximately half of our subjects, it was paired with a normal activity allele, either *1 or *2. The prevalence of *5, a null allele, was 9.4%. Overall predicted phenotype percentages were normal metabolizers, 46%; intermediate metabolizers, 52%; and poor metabolizers, 1%.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)756-759
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volume103
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of CYP2D6 genotypes and predicted phenotypes in a cohort of cambodians at high risk for infections with plasmodium vivax'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this