Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Priming with a simplified intradermal HIV-1 DNA vaccine regimen followed by boosting with recombinant HIV-1 MVA vaccine is safe and immunogenic: A phase IIa randomized clinical trial

  • Patricia J. Munseri
  • , Arne Kroidl
  • , Charlotta Nilsson
  • , Agricola Joachim
  • , Christof Geldmacher
  • , Philipp Mann
  • , Candida Moshiro
  • , Said Aboud
  • , Eligius Lyamuya
  • , Leonard Maboko
  • , Marco Missanga
  • , Bahati Kaluwa
  • , Sayoki Mfinanga
  • , Lilly Podola
  • , Asli Bauer
  • , Karina Godoy-Ramirez
  • , Mary Marovich
  • , Bernard Moss
  • , Michael Hoelscher
  • , Frances Gotch
  • Wolfgang Stöhr, Richard Stout, Sheena McCormack, Britta Wahren, Fred Mhalu, Merlin L. Robb, Gunnel Biberfeld, Eric Sandström, Muhammad Bakari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Intradermal priming with HIV-1 DNA plasmids followed by HIV-1MVA boosting induces strong and broad cellular and humoral immune responses. In our previous HIVIS-03 trial, we used 5 injections with 2 pools of HIV-DNA at separate sites for each priming immunization. The present study explores whether HIV-DNA priming can be simplified by reducing the number of DNA injections and administration of combined versus separated plasmid pools. Methods: In this phase IIa, randomized trial, priming was performed using 5 injections of HIV-DNA, 1000 μg total dose, (3 Env and 2 Gag encoding plasmids) compared to two "simplified" regimens of 2 injections of HIV-DNA, 600 μg total dose, of Env- and Gag-encoding plasmid pools with each pool either administered separately or combined. HIV-DNA immunizations were given intradermally at weeks 0, 4, and 12. Boosting was performed intramuscularly with 108 pfu HIV-MVA at weeks 30 and 46. Results: 129 healthy Tanzanian participants were enrolled. There were no differences in adverse events between the groups. The proportion of IFN-γ ELISpot responders to Gag and/or Env peptides after the second HIV-MVA boost did not differ significantly between the groups primed with 2 injections of combined HIV-DNA pools, 2 injections with separated pools, and 5 injections with separated pools (90%, 97% and 97%). There were no significant differences in the magnitude of Gag and/or Env IFN-γ ELISpot responses, in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses measured as IFN-γ/IL-2 production by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) or in response rates and median titers for binding antibodies to Env gp160 between study groups. Conclusions: A simplified intradermal vaccination regimen with 2 injections of a total of 600 μg with combined HIV-DNA plasmids primed cellular responses as efficiently as the standard regimen of 5 injections of a total of 1000 μg with separated plasmid pools after boosting twice with HIV-MVA. Trial Registration: World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform PACTR2010050002122368.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0119629
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Priming with a simplified intradermal HIV-1 DNA vaccine regimen followed by boosting with recombinant HIV-1 MVA vaccine is safe and immunogenic: A phase IIa randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this