Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Procedures for the Comparative Testing of Noninvasive Neuroassessment Devices

  • Paul E. Rapp
  • , David O. Keyser*
  • , Adele M.K. Gilpin
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A sequential process for comparison testing of noninvasive neuroassessment devices is presented. Comparison testing of devices in a clinical population should be preceded by computational research and reliability testing with healthy populations, as opposed to proceeding immediately to testing with clinical participants. A five-step process is outlined as follows: 1. Complete a preliminary literature review identifying candidate measures. 2. Conduct systematic simulation studies to determine the computational properties and data requirements of candidate measures. 3. Establish the test-retest reliability of each measure in a healthy comparison population and the clinical population of interest. 4. Investigate the clinical validity of reliable measures in appropriately defined clinical populations. 5. Complete device usability assessment (weight, simplicity of use, cost effectiveness, ruggedness) only for devices and measures that are promising after steps 1 through 4 are completed. Usability may be considered throughout the device evaluation process but such considerations are subordinate to the higher priorities addressed in steps 1 through 4.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1281-1286
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Neurotrauma
Volume32
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Aug 2015

Keywords

  • assessment
  • psychophysiology
  • test-retest reliability
  • validity qEEG

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Procedures for the Comparative Testing of Noninvasive Neuroassessment Devices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this