Prognostic Scores for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Raquel Morillo, Lisa Moores, David Jiménez*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


Rapid and accurate risk stratification is critical in determining the optimal treatment strategy for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Early identification of patients with normal blood pressure and a favorable prognosis (low-risk PE) might select a subset of patients for outpatient treatment, which is associated with reduced cost and improved patient satisfaction, and has been shown to be effective and safe. Alternatively, identification of normotensive patients deemed as having a high risk for PE-related adverse clinical events (intermediate-high-risk PE) might select a subset of patients for close observation and consideration of escalation of therapy. Clinical prognostic scores have been gaining importance in the classification of patients into these categories. They should be derived and validated following strict methodological standards, and their use in clinical practice should be encouraged.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)486-492
Number of pages7
JournalSeminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes


  • mortality
  • prognosis
  • pulmonary embolism
  • scores
  • survival


Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic Scores for Acute Pulmonary Embolism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this