TY - JOUR
T1 - Prophylactic antibiotic use in penetrating abdominal trauma
T2 - An eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guideline
AU - Goldberg, Stephanie R.
AU - Anand, Rahul J.
AU - Como, John J.
AU - Dechert, Tracey
AU - Dente, Christopher
AU - Luchette, Fred A.
AU - Ivatury, Rao R.
AU - Duane, Therese M.
PY - 2012/11
Y1 - 2012/11
N2 - BACKGROUND: The use of prophylactic antibiotics in penetrating abdominal trauma has resulted in decreased infection rates. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) first published its practice management guidelines (PMGs) for the use of prophylactic antibiotics in penetrating abdominal trauma in 1998. During the next decade, several new prospective studies were published on this topic. In addition, the practice of damage control laparotomy became widely used, and additional questions arose as to the role of prophylactic antibiotics in this setting. Thus, the EAST Practice Management Guidelines Committee set out to update the original PMG. METHODS: A search of the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health MEDLINE databases was performed using PubMed (www.pubmed.gov) and specific key words. The search retrieved English language articles regarding the use of antibiotics in penetrating abdominal trauma published from 1973 to 2011. The topics investigated were the need for perioperative antibiotics, the duration of antibiotic therapy, the dose of antibiotics in patients presenting in hemorrhagic shock, and the appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy in the setting of damage control laparotomy. RESULTS: Forty-four articles were identified for inclusion in this review. CONCLUSION: There is evidence to support a Level I recommendation that prophylactic antibiotics should only be administered for 24 hours in the presence of a hollow viscus injury. In addition, there are no data to support continuing prophylactic antibiotics longer than 24 hours in damage control laparotomy.
AB - BACKGROUND: The use of prophylactic antibiotics in penetrating abdominal trauma has resulted in decreased infection rates. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) first published its practice management guidelines (PMGs) for the use of prophylactic antibiotics in penetrating abdominal trauma in 1998. During the next decade, several new prospective studies were published on this topic. In addition, the practice of damage control laparotomy became widely used, and additional questions arose as to the role of prophylactic antibiotics in this setting. Thus, the EAST Practice Management Guidelines Committee set out to update the original PMG. METHODS: A search of the National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health MEDLINE databases was performed using PubMed (www.pubmed.gov) and specific key words. The search retrieved English language articles regarding the use of antibiotics in penetrating abdominal trauma published from 1973 to 2011. The topics investigated were the need for perioperative antibiotics, the duration of antibiotic therapy, the dose of antibiotics in patients presenting in hemorrhagic shock, and the appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy in the setting of damage control laparotomy. RESULTS: Forty-four articles were identified for inclusion in this review. CONCLUSION: There is evidence to support a Level I recommendation that prophylactic antibiotics should only be administered for 24 hours in the presence of a hollow viscus injury. In addition, there are no data to support continuing prophylactic antibiotics longer than 24 hours in damage control laparotomy.
KW - Penetrating abdominal trauma
KW - antibiotics
KW - infection
KW - prophylaxis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869775616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182701902
DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182701902
M3 - Article
C2 - 23114488
AN - SCOPUS:84869775616
SN - 2163-0755
VL - 73
SP - S321-S325
JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
IS - 5 SUPPL.4
ER -