Quantified kinematics to evaluate patient chemotherapy risks in clinic

Zaki Hasnain, Tanachat Nilanon, Ming Li, Aaron Mejia, Anand Kolatkar, Luciano Nocera, Cyrus Shahabi, Frankie A. Cozzens Philips, Jerry S.H. Lee, Sean E. Hanlon, Poorva Vaidya, Naoto T. Ueno, Sriram Yennu, Paul K. Newton, Peter Kuhn, Jorge Nieva*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE Performance status (PS) is a key factor in oncologic decision making, but conventional scales used to measure PS vary among observers. Consumer-grade biometric sensors have previously been identified as objective alternatives to the assessment of PS. Here, we investigate how one such biometric sensor can be used during a clinic visit to identify patients who are at risk for complications, particularly unexpected hospitalizations that may delay treatment or result in low physical activity. We aim to provide a novel and objective means of predicting tolerability to chemotherapy. METHODS Thirty-eight patients across three centers in the United States who were diagnosed with a solid tumor with plans for treatment with two cycles of highly emetogenic chemotherapy were included in this single-arm, observational prospective study. A noninvasive motion-capture system quantified patient movement from chair to table and during the get-up-and-walk test. Activity levels were recorded using a wearable sensor over a 2-month period. Changes in kinematics from two motion-capture data points pre- and post-treatment were tested for correlation with unexpected hospitalizations and physical activity levels as measured by a wearable activity sensor. RESULTS Among 38 patients (mean age, 48.3 years; 53% female), kinematic features from chair to table were the best predictors for unexpected health care encounters (area under the curve, 0.775 6 0.029) and physical activity (area under the curve, 0.830 6 0.080). Chair-to-table acceleration of the nonpivoting knee (t = 3.39; P = .002) was most correlated with unexpected health care encounters. Get-up-and-walk kinematics were most correlated with physical activity, particularly the right knee acceleration (t = −2.95; P = .006) and left arm angular velocity (t = −2.4; P = .025). CONCLUSION Chair-to-table kinematics are good predictors of unexpected hospitalizations, whereas the get-up- and-walk kinematics are good predictors of low physical activity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)583-601
Number of pages19
JournalJCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
Volume4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantified kinematics to evaluate patient chemotherapy risks in clinic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this