Abstract
Since some care providers give colleagues’ interests priority over patients’ and families’, they are at risk of imposing their bias on patients without knowing this. In this piece I discuss how the risk increases when care providers have greater discretion and how they can best avoid this risk. I discuss identifying these situations, assessing them, and then, based on what they have concluded, intervening and use their having inadequate resources, their seeing what patients want as futile, and their making decisions regarding surrogate decision makers as paradigmatic examples. As “remedies,” I suggest that care providers share with patients their rationales, validate adaptive aspects of difficult behaviors, self-disclose, and sometimes even go beyond their usual clinical practices.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 5-10 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Ethics |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2023 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Questions Care Providers Should Ask When They Have Ethical Discretion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver