Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Racial Disparities in US Infant Birth Outcomes: A Protective Effect of Military Affiliation?

  • Jennifer Lundquist*
  • , Irma Elo
  • , Wanda Barfield
  • , Zhun Xu
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research has been unable to determine why African Americans have higher infant mortality and preterm birth prevalence than whites, even taking into account measurable social and economic differences. This is, in part, due to the difficulty of adequately measuring the impacts of racial inequality and residential segregation. As an alternative approach, this paper comparatively examines infant outcomes among military-affiliated and civilian black and white women. The military setting provides higher-than-average economic equality and universal healthcare access. Although military-affiliated populations are usually left out of most major datasets, we construct a new variable that allows us to identify military affiliation using the CDC's PRAMS survey data. Multinomial logistic regression analyses show that there is a negative association between adverse birth outcomes and military affiliation for both white and black women. Thus, the black-white infant mortality gap persists in the military even though black affiliates experience significant improvement in outcomes relative to their same-race civilian counterparts. Nevertheless, the black-white disparity among military-affiliated women is somewhat lessened compared to the black-white civilian disparity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-180
Number of pages20
JournalRace and Social Problems
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2014

Keywords

  • Infant mortality
  • Military
  • Preterm birth
  • US racial disparities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Racial Disparities in US Infant Birth Outcomes: A Protective Effect of Military Affiliation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this