TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Angiotensin Receptor Antagonist Losartan for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
AU - LOSe-PTSD Investigators
AU - Stein, Murray B.
AU - Jain, Sonia
AU - Simon, Naomi M.
AU - West, James C.
AU - Marvar, Paul J.
AU - Bui, Eric
AU - He, Feng
AU - Benedek, David M.
AU - Cassano, Paolo
AU - Griffith, James L.
AU - Howlett, Jonathan
AU - Malgaroli, Matteo
AU - Melaragno, Andrew
AU - Seligowski, Antonia V.
AU - Shu, I. Wei
AU - Song, Suzan
AU - Szuhany, Kristin
AU - Taylor, Charles T.
AU - Ressler, Kerry J.
AU - Beg, Nuzhat
AU - Sun, Xiaoying
AU - Shaikh, Farah
AU - Spangler, Patricia T.
AU - Dempsey, Catherine L.
AU - Eakley, Rachel
AU - Kaufmann, Milissa L.
AU - Murphy, Beth L.
AU - Merker, Julia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Society of Biological Psychiatry
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - Background: Evidence-based pharmacological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are few and of limited efficacy. Previous work suggests that angiotensin type 1 receptor inhibition facilitates fear inhibition and extinction, important for recovery from PTSD. This study tests the efficacy of the angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist losartan, an antihypertensive drug, repurposed for the treatment of PTSD. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted for 10 weeks in 149 men and women meeting DSM-5 PTSD criteria. Losartan (vs. placebo) was flexibly titrated from 25 to 100 mg/day by week 6 and held at highest tolerated dose until week 10. Primary outcome was the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) change score at 10 weeks from baseline. A key secondary outcome was change in CAPS-5 associated with a single nucleotide polymorphism of the ACE gene. Additional secondary outcomes included changes in the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and proportion of responders with a Clinical Global Impressions–Improvement scale of “much improved” or “very much improved.” Results: Both groups had robust improvement in PTSD symptoms, but there was no significant difference on the primary end point, CAPS-5 measured as week 10 change from baseline, between losartan and placebo (mean change difference, 0.9, 95% confidence interval, −3.2 to 5.0). There was no significant difference in the proportion of Clinical Global Impressions–Improvement scale responders for losartan (58.6%) versus placebo (57.9%), no significant differences in changes in PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 or Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and no association between ACE genotype and CAPS-5 improvement on losartan. Conclusions: At these doses and durations, there was no significant benefit of losartan compared with placebo for the treatment of PTSD. We discuss implications for failure to determine the benefit of a repurposed drug with strong a priori expectations of success based on preclinical and epidemiological data.
AB - Background: Evidence-based pharmacological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are few and of limited efficacy. Previous work suggests that angiotensin type 1 receptor inhibition facilitates fear inhibition and extinction, important for recovery from PTSD. This study tests the efficacy of the angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist losartan, an antihypertensive drug, repurposed for the treatment of PTSD. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted for 10 weeks in 149 men and women meeting DSM-5 PTSD criteria. Losartan (vs. placebo) was flexibly titrated from 25 to 100 mg/day by week 6 and held at highest tolerated dose until week 10. Primary outcome was the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) change score at 10 weeks from baseline. A key secondary outcome was change in CAPS-5 associated with a single nucleotide polymorphism of the ACE gene. Additional secondary outcomes included changes in the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and proportion of responders with a Clinical Global Impressions–Improvement scale of “much improved” or “very much improved.” Results: Both groups had robust improvement in PTSD symptoms, but there was no significant difference on the primary end point, CAPS-5 measured as week 10 change from baseline, between losartan and placebo (mean change difference, 0.9, 95% confidence interval, −3.2 to 5.0). There was no significant difference in the proportion of Clinical Global Impressions–Improvement scale responders for losartan (58.6%) versus placebo (57.9%), no significant differences in changes in PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 or Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and no association between ACE genotype and CAPS-5 improvement on losartan. Conclusions: At these doses and durations, there was no significant benefit of losartan compared with placebo for the treatment of PTSD. We discuss implications for failure to determine the benefit of a repurposed drug with strong a priori expectations of success based on preclinical and epidemiological data.
KW - ACE
KW - Angiotensin
KW - ARB
KW - Hypertension
KW - Losartan
KW - PTSD
KW - Randomized controlled trial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111349171&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.05.012
DO - 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.05.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 34275593
AN - SCOPUS:85111349171
SN - 0006-3223
VL - 90
SP - 473
EP - 481
JO - Biological Psychiatry
JF - Biological Psychiatry
IS - 7
ER -